The (Cost-)Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners Working at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01388374|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 6, 2011
Last Update Posted : April 22, 2015
The aim of this study is to explore whether the implementation of Nurse Practitioners can lead to a more accessible and efficient patient care at the primary out of hours service.
The primary objectives of the proposed study are:
- What are the effects of the implementation of NPs on the primary out of hours service in comparison with the current out of hours service? Effects in terms of accessibility, objective and subjective workload of general practitioners, quality of care and patient satisfaction.
- How efficient is the implementation of NPs in the primary out of hours services?
- What is the feasibility of the implementation of NPs in the out of hours services? And under which conditions?
- What are the barriers and facilitating factors considering the implementation of NPs?
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment|
|Out of Hours Medical Care Primary Health Care||Other: Other, care provided by Nurse Practitioners|
The emergency care and primary out of hours care in the Netherlands is under pressure. There is a rising demand from patients for acute care at the primary out of hours service (run by General Practitioners) as well as for the emergency departments (EDs) at the hospitals. The workload for healthcare professionals in these acute care setting is high. Without changes in the organization of primary out of hours care and emergency care, the quality, accessibility and efficiency of the acute care can't be guaranteed in the future.
The substitution of care from General Practitioners (GPs) to Nurse Practitioners (NPs) is seen as one possible solution to decrease the GPs' workload and improve accessibility and efficiency of care without reducing the quality of care.
It turned out that about 80% of the acute complaints is U3 and U4 (low complex and not urgent) and does not necessarily to be seen by a physician.
Based on previous research we expect that the NPs are competent to diagnose and treat almost all low complex and not urgent complaints. During surgery hours (day time) the NPs act in about 90% of the consultations independently.
Hypothetical substitution of care should contribute to enhancing quality, improving accessibility and reducing the workload of doctors. It can also benefit the efficiency of the acute (primary out of hours) care.
However, specific scientific evidence for this is lacking.
In this study we examine whether substitution of care from GPs to NPs in a primary out of hours care setting can contribute to a more accessible and efficient patient care. Also the feasibility of implementing NPs in a primary our of hours setting is examined.
Comparison: Care provided by the Nurse Practitioner will be compared to care provided by a General Practitioner.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||12092 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Primary Purpose:||Health Services Research|
|Official Title:||A Study on the (Cost-)Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners Working at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service and the Feasibility of Implementing These Nurses|
|Study Start Date :||December 2010|
|Primary Completion Date :||July 2012|
|Study Completion Date :||October 2012|
No Intervention: General Practitioners Care
Usual medical care provided by a general practitioner at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service.
Experimental: Nurse Practitioners Care
Medical care provided by the Nurse Practitioner at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service.
Other: Other, care provided by Nurse Practitioners
Patients will receive care at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service by a Nurse Practitioner instead of a General Practitioner (substitution of care from physicians to nurses).
- Accessibility of care [ Time Frame: 15 months ]Number of patients that have a consult at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service; Waiting time; Productivity by NPs in comparison with productivity by GPs.
- Quality and safety of care [ Time Frame: 15 months ]
Quality and safety of care will be measured by video/audio recording. In total, 60 consultations/visits will be recorded. 30 of the General Practitioner and 30 of the Nurse Practitioner. The care between these two disciplines will be compared according to the practice guidelines for General Practitioners (list of indicators).
Furthermore, we report the amount of adverse events and complications. Also complaints by the patients will be recorded.
- Patient satisfaction [ Time Frame: 15 months ]Patient satisfaction will be measured by a questionnaire (CQ-index). At baseline and three times during the intervention period questionnaires will be sent to patients who had a consult at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service.
- Feasibility [ Time Frame: 15 months ]Barriers and facilitators will be explored. We collect this information through semi-structured interviews with GPs, practice assistants, NPs and physicians working at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service.
- Efficiency of care [ Time Frame: 15 months ]
To measure the efficiency of healthcare, we will measure type of consultation; duration of the consult; type of care provider; number of patients; number of prescriptions; number of test & investigations ordered, referral to other healthcare providers and the emergency department.
These data will be derived from the electronic medical records and patient questionnaires.
- Workload [ Time Frame: 15 months ]
Objective workload will be measured by the numbers of consults, taking into account the urgency levels of the complaints. This data will be derived from the electronic medical records
Subjective workload will be measured by a questionnaire. General practitioners as well as the practice assistants at the Primary Out of Hours Emergency Service receive a questionnaire before and after the intervention period to measure satisfaction with care and workload issues
- Knowledge/competence of the NPs [ Time Frame: 15 months ]After 9 months, we will measure the knowledge of NPs with regard to a number of frequently presented complaints. We will use a 'knowledge test' used to examine the knowledge of GP trainees. Besides NPs also a random selection of GPs (with similar experience of practice) will be invited to fill in the knowledge test.
- Cost-analysis [ Time Frame: 15 months ]
All costs related to care provided by NPs and GPs will be calculated, including number of consultations, resource use, referrals, etc. We will also include the costs for training of GPs and NPs.
The EQ-D5 will be used as standardized measure for health status of the patient.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01388374
|Centrale Huisartsen Post (CHP)|
|Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands, 5623 EJ|
|Principal Investigator:||M.G.H. Laurant, Dr.||IQ healthcare, UMC St Radboud|