Prolift Versus IVS for Pelvic Floor Prolapse
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01383291|
Recruitment Status : Withdrawn
First Posted : June 28, 2011
Last Update Posted : June 20, 2014
- Women who underwent mesh or sling procedures to correct pelvic organ prolapse will be enrolled.
- Their data will be collected from the files.
- Comparison between two groups will be carried our: Those who underwent a posterior IVS and those who underwent posterior prolift procedure.
- The data will be obtained by questionaires by a telephone interview by a physician who did not participate in the surgery.
- Follow-up physical examination data will also be obtained.
|Condition or disease|
|Pelvic Floor Prolapse|
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Actual Enrollment :||0 participants|
|Observational Model:||Case Control|
|Official Title:||Postoperative Comparison Between Posterior Prolift Mesh Placement and Posterior IVS Sling Placement|
|Study Start Date :||February 2009|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||January 2013|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||June 2013|
Pelvic floor prolapse
Those who underwent prolift and those who underwent IVS
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01383291
|Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Western Galilee Hospital|
|Clinics of Dr Neuman|
|Rishon Lezion, Israel|