Impact of Initiating Tiotropium Alone Versus Initiating Tiotropium in Combination With Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Xinafoate Combination (FSC) on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-related Outcomes in Patients With Pre-existing Exacerbations
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01381406|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 27, 2011
Results First Posted : October 21, 2011
Last Update Posted : June 14, 2017
This was a retrospective cohort design using administrative claims data from Jan 1, 2003 through Sep 30, 2007, representing the years of available data, were used for this study. Managed care enrollees having at least one pharmacy claim for tiotropium (TIO) during the study period were identified as the target population. An index TIO prescription was defined as the first chronologically occurring pharmacy claim for TIO during the period Jan 1, 2004 to Aug 31, 2006, called the enrollment period. The date of the index TIO prescription was termed as the index Rx date, and the 1-year period before the index Rx date was termed as the pre-index period. The period after the index date was termed as the post-index date, and is further divided into a 30-day combination assessment period and a 1-year follow-up period. COPD clinical and economic outcomes were measured in a variable length follow up period.
The combination assessment period, defined as the 30-day period following the index Rx date, was used to categorize patients into 2 cohorts: TIO alone or TIO + FSC (fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinofoate combination) depending on whether they use FSC in combination with TIO during this period. Combination therapy with TIO + FSC was defined as having an FSC claim on the same date as the TIO claim or a TIO and FSC pharmacy claim with overlapping days supply occurring within 30 days of index Rx date. Enrollees adding FSC for the first time after the 30-day combination assessment period were excluded from the sample, thus ensuring that the TIO-alone cohort is not using FSC. No outcomes were assessed in the 30-day combination assessment period. The 1-year period after the end of the 30-day combination assessment period was termed as the follow-up period and was used to assess all study outcomes. Enrollees were required to be continuously eligible in their health plans during the pre-index and post-index periods for a total of 25 months. An intent-to-treat approach was used for the analyses. Thus, patients identified to be in a drug therapy cohort were considered to be using that therapy during the entire follow-up period, regardless of therapy discontinuations.
Specifically the study hypothesis for the primary outcome being tested was:
Ho: There is no difference in risk of any COPD-related exacerbation between TIO+FSC and TIO cohorts Ha: There is a difference in risk of any COPD-related exacerbation between TIO+FSC and TIO cohorts
Hypothesis for the key secondary outcome of COPD-related costs that was tested was:
Ho: There is no difference in COPD-related costs between TIO+FSC and TIO cohorts Ha: There is a difference in COPD-related costs between TIO+FSC and TIO cohorts
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment|
|Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive||Drug: TIO Drug: TIO+FSC|
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Actual Enrollment :||3333 participants|
|Official Title:||Impact of Initiating Tiotropium Alone Versus Initiating Tiotropium in Combination With Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Xinafoate Combination (FSC) on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-related Outcomes in Patients With Pre-existing Exacerbations|
|Study Start Date :||July 2008|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||June 2010|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||September 2010|
Patients who are at least 40 years of age and diagnosed with COPD using ICD-9 codes of 491.xx, 492.xx, and 496.xx in an administrative claims database.
Patients receiving tiotropium bromide at index within the study period.
Other Name: Spiriva®
Patients receiving tiotropium bromide plus fluticasone propionate-salmeterol xinafoate combination at time of index within the study period.
Other Name: Spiriva ® + ADVAIR ®
- Incidence Rate Per 100 Person Years of Hospitalization or Emergency Department (ED) Visit Related to Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [ Time Frame: Data were collected over a maximum period of 4 years ]A severe exacerbation is defined as one with a primary diagnosis of COPD. A moderate exacerbation is an ED visit with a primary diagnosis of COPD, a physician visit with a diagnosis of COPD and a prescription for an oral corticosteroid, a physician visit with a diagnosis code for COPD and an antibiotic for respiratory infection, or physician administration of nebulized albuterol within 3 days of an office visit. Incidence rate is calculated by dividing the number of exacerbations by the number of person years. Person years adjust for different lengths of follow up for participants.
- Adjusted Mean Monthly Costs Per COPD Patient by Treatment Group [ Time Frame: Data were collected over a maximum period of 4 years ]The mean costs of health care encounters adjusted to control for baseline differences between treatment groups and reported in 2008 United States dollars as calculated with the consumer price index (CPI) are presented. CPI is standard multiplier for adjusting the cost of goods and services to a single year. Total costs include pharmacy and medical costs. Medical costs were computed from the paid amounts of medical claims with a primary diagnosis code for COPD. COPD-related pharmacy costs were computed from paid amounts of COPD-related prescription medications.
- Incidence Rate of Hospitalizations and Emergency Room Visits Per 100 Person Years [ Time Frame: Data were collected over a maximum period of 4 years ]Unadjusted incidence rates per 100 person years of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits by treatment group are presented. Incidence rate is calculated by dividing the number of healthcare service encounters by the number of person years of follow up. Person years adjust for different lengths of follow up for individual participants
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01381406
|Study Director:||GSK Clinical Trials||GlaxoSmithKline|