Study of a Treatment Driven by Early PET Response to a Treatment Not Monitored by Early PET in Patients With AA Stage 3-4 or 2B HL (AHL 2011)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01358747|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : May 24, 2011
Last Update Posted : May 21, 2014
All study treatments have proven efficacy in the treatment in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). It is hoped that patients will achieve a good response to both induction therapies consisting either of 4 cycles of BEACOPPesc (Bleomycin, Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Procarbazine, and Prednisone) or 2 cycles of BEACOPPesc plus 2 cycles of ABVD (Adriamycine, Bléomycine, Vinblastine, Décarbazine).
The use of F-FDG Position Emission Tomography performed after 2 cycles of chemotherapy (PET2) in the experimental arm will help to stratify patients in order to restrict the BEACOPPesc therapy continuation to those patients who achieved only a partial response after 2 BEACOPPesc regimen and to allow a conventional dose ABVD chemotherapy strategy for PET2 negative patients. For all patients included in the trial the achievement of a good response to induction treatment will be checked after four cycles of induction treatment including a centrally reviewed PET assessment
Patients will be randomized after verification of eligibility and before the start of the protocol treatment.Patients will be randomly assigned to the standard treatment arm not monitored by early PET, or the experimental treatment arm driven by the PET2 result.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Hodgkin's Lymphoma||Drug: BEACOPPesc Drug: BEACOPPesc - ABVD - PET2||Phase 3|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Official Title:||Randomized Phase III Study of a Treatment Driven by Early PET Response Compared to a Treatment Not Monitored by Early PET in Patients With Ann Arbor Stage III-IV or High Risk IIB Hodgkin Lymphoma|
|Study Start Date :||May 2011|
Active Comparator: Standard arm
Induction treatment: Patients will be treated by a BEACOPPesc regimen every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. A PET will be performed after 2 cycles of chemotherapy (PET2) with no decisional value, and after 4 cycles with decisional value. Consolidation treatment: depends on the reviewed PET4 result. In case of PET4 negative result, patient will received 2 additional cycles of BEACOPPesc, whatever the result of the PET2. In case of PET4 positive, the patient will be considered in treatment failure and proposed to a salvage therapy after pathologic confirmation of failure by biopsy of the hypermetabolic residual mass when possible.
Experimental: Experimental arm
Induction treatment: Patients will be treated by a BEACOPPesc regimen every 3 weeks for 2 cycles followed by a PET scan (PET2).
After PET2 central review:
Consolidation treatment: depends on the reviewed PET4 result In case of PET4 negative result, consolidation treatment will depends on PET2 results:
Drug: BEACOPPesc - ABVD - PET2
- Progression free survival [ Time Frame: 5 years ]Evaluate by PFS at 5 years the non-inferiority of a chemotherapy of a therapeutic strategy driven by PET with a ABVD conventional dose chemotherapy for patients reaching a negative PET after 2 cycles of BEACOPPesc, compared to a treatment not monitored by early PET delivering 6 cycles of BEACOPPesc.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01358747
|Principal Investigator:||René-Olivier CASASNOVAS, MD||CHU Dijon|