Accuracy of Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Assisted With Continuous Pulse-train Stimulation
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01342588|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified April 2011 by American British Cowdray Medical Center.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : April 27, 2011
Last Update Posted : April 27, 2011
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Spine Pedicle Screw Placement||Procedure: Electric pulse train stimulation||Not Applicable|
Pedicle screw instrumentation as part of spine surgery is a recurrent technique used for most of spine surgeons. Since its description by Boucher in 1959 and its popularization later by Roy-Camille, has been considered a technique that demands great anatomy knowledge and some grade of expertise. Even in experienced hands the misplacement of pedicle screws could have an incidence of 10-40% (average of 20%). Medially misplacements during track creation and screw insertion are the most feared complications, because the anatomic relationship between medial pedicle wall and neural structures. The first attempt to use continuous electrical stimulation during pedicle track creation and screw insertion was communicated in 1997 by Welch WC, et al. In that study they used the bone impedance as a direct measurement of pedicle wall integrity; unfortunately they used inhaled anesthetics and assessed the final screw position with plain X-rays. They reported a sensibility and specificity of 98% and 99% respectively. The great limitation for this study is its assessment of screw accuracy performed by plain X-rays, now a days the best way to do it is with computed tomography (CT).
After the Welch report, a couple of studies more have used similar techniques in the thoracic spine trying to avoid neurological injuries during pedicle screw insertion, but none described the use of continuous train pulses during screwing.
The present study pretends to evaluate the final accuracy and trans-operative usefulness of the pulse train stimulation during track creation and screw insertion using intra venous anesthetic agents and CT scans to assess the integrity of pedicle walls
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||60 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Primary Purpose:||Supportive Care|
|Official Title:||Accuracy of Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Assisted With Continuous Pulse-train Stimulation During Track Creation and Screw Insertion|
|Study Start Date :||January 2011|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||April 2012|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||May 2012|
Experimental: Electrical stimulation
Only arm of the study, the experimental
Procedure: Electric pulse train stimulation
Electric pulse train stimulation of regular probes and screw drivers used in track creation and screw placement Using a standard neurophysiological work station, a series of square wave pulses will be delivered through standard probes and screw drivers using an alligator clip during pedicle probing and screw insertion (4 Hz for 50-200 μsec at 10-30 μAmp)
- Intra operative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) alert [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of surgical procedure, an expected average of 3-4 hours ]- Continuous electrical stimulation delivered by a wire connected to the surgical instruments only during pedicle track creation and screw placement combined with neurophysiological monitoring will let us identify any IONM alert, defined as nerve irritation or a decrease in voltage and/or amplitude response. This is a single and immediate measurement obtained at surgery during spinal screw placement.
- Pedicle screw accuracy [ Time Frame: On day 2 after surgery before patient discharge, a CT scan will be performed ]On day 2 post surgery, a CT scan with sagittal, coronal and axial reconstructions will be obtained . The same day of the study, two independent observers will assess the accuracy of screws inside lumbar pedicles, recording in millimeters, any pedicle wall violation on sagittal, axial and coronal views for each screw placed. In that way we could have the accuracy of pedicle screws placed with the proposed technique, before patient discharge.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01342588
|Contact: Ernesto E Galvan Hernandez, MD, MsC||52 (55) 16647205 ext email@example.com|
|American British Cowdray Medical Center||Recruiting|
|Mexico City, Mexico DF, Mexico, 05300|
|Contact: Ernesto E Galvan Hernandez, MD, MsC 16647205 ext 4155 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator: Ernesto E Galvan Hernandez, MD, MsC|
|Sub-Investigator: Roberto De Leo, MD|
|Sub-Investigator: Miguel Angel Collado Corona, MD|
|Sub-Investigator: Angel Romero, MD|
|Sub-Investigator: Maximino Tellez Gutierrez, MD|
|Sub-Investigator: Ildelfonso Muñoz Romero, MD|
|Principal Investigator:||Ernesto E Galvan Hernandez, MD, MsC||American British Cowdray Medical Center, Neurological Center|