This site became the new on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu
Give us feedback

Economisation of Whipple Resection Using an Ultrasonic Dissection Device

This study has been completed.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Identifier:
First received: January 24, 2011
Last updated: November 5, 2011
Last verified: November 2011
Including 150 randomised patient, the studies aim is to determine whether an economisation and/or improvement in terms of operating time, drainage fluid, blood loss, time of hospitalisation can be found using an ultrasonic dissection device versus traditional surgical methods such as stitches an ligations.The study is performed for patients undergoing partial pancreatoduodenectomy.

Patients Planned for Partial Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Carcinoma, Periampullary Carcinoma, Chronic Pancreatitis and Other Benign Lesions.

Study Type: Observational
Study Design: Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Economisation of Preparation by Using an Ultrasonic Dissection Device in Partial Pancreatoduodenectomy

Resource links provided by NLM:

Further study details as provided by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Total operation time [ Time Frame: end of operation ]
    Measurement of time regarding incision-closure-time

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • intraoperative blood loss [ Time Frame: end of operation ]
  • number of transfusions [ Time Frame: within the first 24 hours perioperatively ]
  • hospitalization time [ Time Frame: end of hospitalization ]
  • resulting cost reduction [ Time Frame: end of hospitalization ]
  • pancreatic fistula [ Time Frame: within the first 5 days postoperatively ]
  • postoperative intervention [ Time Frame: end of hospitalization ]
    Postoperative interventions due complications, e.g. pancreatic fistula

Estimated Enrollment: 150
Study Start Date: March 2009
Study Completion Date: October 2011
Primary Completion Date: July 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Group A
Preparation with Harmonic WAVE
Group B
Preparation with conventional modalities


Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients planned for partial pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma, periampullary carcinoma, chronic pancreatitis and other benign lesions.

Inclusion Criteria:

resectable tumor

Exclusion Criteria:

palliative resection

  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its identifier: NCT01321450

UH Eppendorf
Hamburg, Germany, 22529
Agia Olga hospital
Athens, Greece
UH Verona
Verona, Italy, 37134
Sponsors and Collaborators
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Principal Investigator: Jacob R. Izbicki, Prof. Dr. Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
  More Information

Additional Information:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by Identifier (NCT Number):
Responsible Party: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Identifier: NCT01321450     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 2908
Study First Received: January 24, 2011
Last Updated: November 5, 2011

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Pancreatitis, Chronic
Pancreatic Diseases
Digestive System Diseases processed this record on September 21, 2017