Benefits of Universal Glove and Gowning (BUGG)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01318213|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified January 2012 by Yale New Haven Health System Center for Healthcare Solutions.
Recruitment status was: Active, not recruiting
First Posted : March 18, 2011
Last Update Posted : January 5, 2012
This study will test if doctors, nurses and other people who take care of patients in hospitals wearing gloves and gown for all contact with patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) will:
- Decrease the chance of patients getting an infection while in the hospital
- Decrease the chance of patients picking up bacteria as a result of being in the hospital
- Decrease the time a patient spends in the ICU or in the hospital
- Increase the frequency of adverse events
The study will also look at whether making doctors, nurses and other people who take care of patients wear gloves and gown for all contact with patients will decrease the amount of time healthcare workers spend with patients.
This study will gather information by comparing what happens in ICUs that continue to do what they were doing before the study with what happens in ICUs that require healthcare workers to wear gloves and gown for all contact with patients.
This study will provide information that will help to make being in the hospital safer for all patients.
|Condition or disease|
Show Detailed Description
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Estimated Enrollment :||2 participants|
|Official Title:||Effect of the Use of Universal Glove and Gowning on Healthcare Associated Infection Rates and Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria|
|Study Start Date :||December 2010|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||September 2012|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||September 2012|
The intervention will consist of wearing gloves and gowns for all patient contact in the ICUs that are randomized to receive the intervention. During the intervention phases of the study, all healthcare workers (nurses, physicians, nurse extenders, respiratory therapists, social workers etc.) in the intervention group will be required to wear gloves and gowns for patient contact and when entering any patient room. In essence, healthcare workers will apply the CDC Contact Precautions guidelines for ALL patients.
Non-intervention - Usual Standard of Care
The non-intervention units will follow their present standard of care. For all of these units, this will consist of healthcare workers following Contact Precautions (gloves and gowns) only for patients known to have antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as VRE and MRSA based on previous admission clinical and surveillance cultures or clinical cultures from the present admission. This represents on average 20-25% of patients on Contact Precautions. For the rest of the patients standard precautions will be followed.
- Number of ICU Patients Who Acquire VRE or MRSA [ Time Frame: 9 months ]
The outcome of interest is the acquisition of VRE or MRSA as determined by peri-anal surveillance cultures for VRE and by nasal surveillance cultures for MRSA. The outcomes will be analyzed both individually and collectively.
Acquisition will be defined as:
- A patient who has an initial ICU surveillance culture that is negative for an antibiotic-resistant pathogen.
- Subsequent discharge surveillance culture within the same ICU admission that is positive for an antibiotic-resistant pathogen.
- Number of ICU Patients Who Acquire CABSI,CAUTI or VAP [ Time Frame: 9 months ]In all of the intensive-care units, catheter-associated bloodstream infection, catheter-associated urinary tract infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia rates will be measured in a standardized fashion at the cluster or group level. Data is collected on an individual patient basis in a de-identified fashion and will be reported to investigators at the cluster level
- Changes from Baseline in 30-day Mortality Rate and ICU LOS [ Time Frame: 9 months ]Thirty-day mortality will be a binary outcome of either the patient died at 30-days or was alive at 30-days after ICU admission date. ICU length of stay will be a continuous variable. This information will be recorded on an individual basis by the coordinator but will be reported on a group-level to the research center.
- Number of Adverse Events Occuring in the ICU [ Time Frame: 9 months ]The study will look at a number of adverse events including 30-day mortality and the frequency of healthcare worker visits. Compliance with hand hygiene and the frequency of adverse events as measured by a modified Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) trigger tool.
Biospecimen Retention: Samples Without DNA
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01318213
|United States, Maryland|
|University of Maryland, Baltimore|
|Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201|
|Principal Investigator:||Anthony D Harris, MD, MPH||University of Maryland|