Imatinib and Rituximab in Treating Cutaneous Sclerosis in Patients With Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01309997|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : March 7, 2011
Results First Posted : June 15, 2016
Last Update Posted : June 15, 2016
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Graft Versus Host Disease Systemic Scleroderma||Drug: imatinib mesylate Biological: rituximab||Phase 2|
I. To determine the best clinical response rate of cutaneous sclerosis (skin and/or fascial thickening) after 6 months of initial therapy with either imatinib (imatinib mesylate) or rituximab.
I. To determine the best response at either the 3 or 6 month assessment.
II. To determine the response rate at the 3 month assessment.
III. To determine the proportion of subjects who are able to taper corticosteroid after 6 months of imatinib or rituximab therapy.
IV. To determine the incidence of treatment failure to initial treatment with either imatinib or rituximab.
V. To evaluate if the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) findings correlate with severity of cutaneous sclerosis clinical findings and response to study treatment.
VI. To correlate the detection of antibody against platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFR A) with clinical response.
VII. To correlate change in B cell relevant parameters from baseline to 6 months or early crossover (antibody levels, skin collagen expression, B cell subsets) with therapeutic agent and best clinical response while on initial treatment.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients receive imatinib mesylate by mouth (PO) once daily (QD) for 6 months in the absence of progression of sclerosis or unacceptable toxicity. Subjects with a significant clinical response will continue to receive study drug for an additional 6 months.
ARM II: Patients receive rituximab intravenously (IV) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (first cycle). A second cycle of treatment with rituximab is repeated at 3 months for a total of 8 doses of rituximab in the absence of progression of sclerosis or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients with progression, treatment intolerance at any time up to 6 months, or no clinical response at 6 months will crossover to the other treatment arm.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||72 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Crossover Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||A Randomized Phase II Study of Imatinib and Rituximab for Cutaneous Sclerosis After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation|
|Study Start Date :||March 2011|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||December 2014|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||December 2015|
Experimental: Arm I (enzyme inhibitor)
Patients receive imatinib mesylate PO QD for 6 months in the absence of progression of sclerosis or unacceptable toxicity.
Drug: imatinib mesylate
Experimental: Arm II (monoclonal antibody)
Patients receive rituximab IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. A second treatment cycle is repeated at 3 months for a total of 8 doses of rituximab in the absence of progression of sclerosis or unacceptable toxicity.
- Significant Clinical Response [ Time Frame: 6 months ]Assessed by decline in an affected area's skin score as measured with the Vienna Skin Scale (from 4 [worst] to 2, 3 to 1, or 2 to 0 [best]) without a concurrent increase of two or more points in another area OR by an increase in the range of motion of the shoulders, elbows or wrists by two points (in a 1-7 scale where 1 is worst and 7 is best) or of the ankles by one point (in a 1 to 4 scale where 1 is worst and 4 is best) without a concurrent worsening in another area.
- Patients Who Were Able to Taper Corticosteroids [ Time Frame: 6 months ]Patients who achieved a greater than or equal to 50% reduction in the daily corticosteroid dose at 6mo compared to baseline
- Cumulative Incidence of Treatment Failure [ Time Frame: 6 months ]Defined as discontinuation of randomized treatment due to chronic GVHD progression or treatment intolerance or no significant clinical response in sclerosis.
- Number of Patients Achieving Improvement in Cutaneous Sclerosis [ Time Frame: 6 months ]Assessed by decrease of >= 0.2 units (where 0 is best and 3.0 is worst ) in the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ).
- Baseline Histopathologic Score in the Two Treatment Arms [ Time Frame: Enrollment ]
Instrument: Nash dermal fibrosis grade. Measures extent of sclerosis in skin biopsies by histologic examination. Scale ranges from grade 0-5. Nash grade 5 is most severe fibrosis (0 is better outcome, 5 is worse outcome). No subscales are used in Nash grade. Please see table 1 in the reference for grading of dermal fibrosis.
Nash RA, McSweeney PA, Crofford LJ, Abidi M, Chen CS, Godwin JD, et al. High-dose immunosuppressive therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for severe systemic sclerosis: long-term follow-up of the US multicenter pilot study. Blood 2007;110:1388-96.
- Patients With Any Percentage Decline in Any Grade of Sclerosis Without Increase in Percentage of Higher Grades of Sclerosis in Other Areas on the Vienna Skin Scale [ Time Frame: 6 months ]Maximum of 10 body areas. Each area can be graded 0 (best) to 4 (worst). Each of those grades requires a percentage of involvement. Improvement is measured by reduction of involvement in any grade and any body area.
- Percentage of CD27+ B Cells in Responders (SCR) and Non-responders [ Time Frame: 6 months ]%CD27+ B cells
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01309997
|United States, Arizona|
|Mayo Clinic in Arizona|
|Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259|
|United States, California|
|Stanford University Hospitals and Clinics|
|Stanford, California, United States, 94305|
|United States, Florida|
|H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute|
|Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612|
|United States, Missouri|
|Washington University School of Medicine|
|Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110|
|United States, New York|
|Roswell Park Cancer Institute|
|Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263|
|Weill Cornell Medical College|
|New York, New York, United States, 10065|
|United States, North Carolina|
|University of North Carolina|
|Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599|
|United States, Tennessee|
|Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center|
|Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232|
|United States, Washington|
|Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium|
|Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109|
|United States, Wisconsin|
|Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin|
|Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226|
|Principal Investigator:||Stephanie Lee||Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium|