The Effects of BAK on the Blood Aqueous Barrier of Pseudophakic Patients
BAK is one of the most frequent preservatives in eye drops. BAK is a quaternary ammonium salt with surfactant qualities. It can be bacteriostatic or bactericidal depending on the concentrations used. It has been shown to be effective against most bacteria with a few exceptions, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or picornaviruses. It as been widely used in eyedrops, nose sprays, hand and face washes, mouthwashes, spermicidal creams, and in various other cleaners, sanitizers, and disinfectants. BAK gained popularity when it was first introduced because it also enhances corneal penetration of some drugs by causing epithelial separation.
It is present in several ophthalmic formulations, including most of the antiglaucoma medications. If used chronically, BAK has been found to cause ocular surface changes, such as dry eye and punctuate keratitis. BAK has also been suggested to promote a break in the blood aqueous barrier, which may lead to undesirable consequences, such as uveitis and cystoid macular edema. However, this information is controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the consequences of BAK on the blood-retinal and blood-aqueous barriers of pseudophakic patients receiving BAK-preserved lubricating drops.
|Dry Eye Syndromes||Drug: Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose Drug: Carboxymethylcellulose||Phase 4|
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||The Effects of BAK on the Blood Aqueous Barrier of Pseudophakic Patients|
- Aqueous Humor Flare [ Time Frame: Baseline, 15 days and 30 days. ]Aqueous humor flare indicates the degree of a break in the blood-aqueous barrier. It is objectively measured with a Laser flare meter.
- Macular Thickness [ Time Frame: Baseline, 15 days and 30 days. ]Macular thickness will be measured with an Optical coherence tomography (OCT). Measures 5% under the normal population according to the OCT software will be considered break in the blood-retina barrier.
|Study Start Date:||March 2011|
|Study Completion Date:||January 2012|
|Primary Completion Date:||December 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Active Comparator: Preserved (BAK 0.006%) lubricating drop
One group will receive preserved lubricating drops 4 times a day for 1 month.
22 patients will receive this lubricating drop 4 times a day for 1 month
Other Name: Retin Active
Active Comparator: Preservative-free lubricating drops
The second group will receive preservative-free lubricating drops 4 times a day for 1 month.
22 patients will receive this lubricating drop 4 times a day for 1 month.
Other Name: Optive UD
The primary hypothesis behind the study is that BAK may lead to a break in the blood-retina barrier in pseudophakic eyes, leading to an increase in macular thickness, compared to a non-BAK containing solution. The secondary hypothesis is that solutions containing BAK will increase the permeability of the blood aqueous barrier compared to non-BAK solutions. If the hypotheses are confirmed, they may serve as a contraindication to the use of BAK-preserved drops in pseudophakic eyes requiring chronic use of medications.
This is a prospective, randomized, examiner-masked, controlled study involving 44 pseudophakic eyes of 44 patients. Patients receiving any other eyedrop, with a previous history of uveitis, posterior capsule rupture or any other ophthalmic surgery will be excluded. Patients will be randomized to the use of a BAK-preserved lubricating drop or to the use of a non-preserved lubricating drop q.i.d for one month. Effects on the blood aqueous barrier will be objectively measured with a laser flare meter (Kowa, Japan) at baseline, 15 days and one month after inclusion. Patients will also have OCT images (Cirrus, Zeiss, USA) of the macula at the same time intervals to evaluate the possible effects on the blood-retina barrier. Macular thickness and the presence of cystoid macular edema will be evaluated at each time interval.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01280110
|Department of Ophthalmology, University of Campinas|
|Campinas, SP, Brazil|
|Principal Investigator:||Vital P Costa, MD||Department of Ophthalmology, University of Campinas|