Comparison of Goal-directed Algorithms of Hemodynamic Therapy After Combined Valve Repair
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01276444|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 13, 2011
Last Update Posted : January 13, 2011
Valvular repair and repair surgery is rapidly progressing yet rather challenging aspect of current cardiosurgical practice.
Several approaches were introduced into the clinical practice to alleviate systemic inflammatory response induced by cardiopulmonary bypass and organ-specific injury including meticulous haemodynamic monitoring, pharmacological heart preconditioning, systemic use of anti-inflammatory agents, prevention of coagulopathy, and induced topical and systemic hypothermia. An in-depth monitoring of haemodynamics, oxygen transport, and vascular permeability is of a great clinical value to control the efficacy of these approaches.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare two algorithms of goal-directed therapy aimed to achieve a postoperative haemodynamic optimization in combined valve repair surgery.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Valvular Heart Disease||Device: Swan-Ganz catheter Device: transpulmonary thermodilution + central venous saturation||Not Applicable|
Forty-three adult patients scheduled for elective two valve replacement/repair were enrolled into randomised single-centre study. All interventions were performed in cardiosurgical department of City hospital #1 (Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation) by the same surgical team. Three patients were excluded from the analysis; two — due to protocol violation and one — due to inadequate surgical correction diagnosed by intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography.
Day before surgery patients were asked for informed consent and randomized in two groups. In the first group postoperative haemodynamic optimization was targeted on parameters provided by pulmonary artery catheter (the PAC-group, n = 20): pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure, cardiac index (LifeScope monitor, Nihon Kohden, Japan) and hemoglobin blood level. In the second group haemodynamics was managed using parameters given by transpulmonary thermodilution (the COMPLEX-group), that included cardiac index, global end-diastolic volume index, extravascular lung water index, continuous central venous oxygen saturation, and oxygen delivery index as measured with PiCCO2 monitor (Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany. In addition, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and hemoglobin concentration were included into both PAC- and PiCCO2-driven protocols.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||43 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Primary Purpose:||Supportive Care|
|Official Title:||Comparison of Goal-directed Algorithms of Hemodynamic Therapy After Combined Valve Repair: a Randomized Clinical Trial|
|Study Start Date :||January 2008|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||August 2010|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||September 2010|
Active Comparator: Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)
PAC was used to guide hemodynamic therapy after combined valve repair
Device: Swan-Ganz catheter
the data s=derived from PAC included pulmonary artery occlusion pressure etc
Other Name: Not actual
Active Comparator: COMPLEX
An combination of transpulmonary thermodilution and continuous monitoring of central venous saturation was used to guide hemodynamic therapy after combined valve repair surgery.
Device: transpulmonary thermodilution + central venous saturation
Described in details above
Other Name: Non actual
- Mortality [ Time Frame: Day 28 ]Mortality rate at Day 28
- Fit for discharge [ Time Frame: non actual ]Formal 'fit for discharge from ICU' criteria
- Vasoactive support [ Time Frame: 7 days ]Duration of vasopressor and or inotrope support
- Duration of respiratory support [ Time Frame: Day 7 ]The total duration of the respiratory support
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01276444
|City hospital # 1 / Northern State Medical University,|
|Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation, 163000|
|Principal Investigator:||Mikhail Y. Kirov, MD, PhD||Northern State Medical University|