The Effect of Pressure Controlled Ventilation on the Pulmonary Mechanics in Prone Position Using the Wilson Frame: A Comparison With Volume Controlled Ventilation
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01272700|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 10, 2011
Last Update Posted : February 3, 2012
Prone position in spinal surgery can increase airway pressure and decrease dynamic lung compliance by a frame used for postural stabilization. Also, it can increase hemodynamic instability such as reduced blood pressure by aggravating cardiac index.
Former study shows pressure controlled ventilation on the pulmonary mechanics can improve alveolar use and oxygenation than volume controlled ventilation. The latter one means controlling a patient's breathing completely through tidal volume and set breathing rate. This could be useful for the patients not possible to breath by themselves because it guarantees the perfect breathing.
The pressure controlled ventilation is used when there is a possibility to change a patient's environment. The pressure will be maintained steadily, but volume and flux will be changed. That means through the pressure already set, the whole breathing will be maintained from the beginning to end. If a patient's resistance is increased, the volume will be decreased even though the way of blood pressure control is same. However, the tidal volume per minute can be controlled somewhat and barotrauma can be decreased by controlling respiratory rate. Through this study, we are expecting the pressure controlled ventilation in prone position can improve lung mechanics and oxygenation.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Herniation of Lumbar Vertebral Disc||Procedure: volume control Procedure: pressure control||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||40 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Double (Participant, Investigator)|
|Primary Purpose:||Supportive Care|
|Official Title:||The Effect of Pressure Controlled Ventilation on the Pulmonary Mechanics in Prone Position Using the Wilson Frame: A Comparison With Volume Controlled Ventilation|
|Study Start Date :||August 2010|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||January 2011|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||January 2011|
Peak airway pressure were set to deliver a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg of ideal body weight
Procedure: volume control
Volume controlled ventilation of tidal volume 10 ml/kg
Active Comparator: VCV
After anesthetic induction, anesthesia maching were set to deliver a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg of ideal body weight
Procedure: pressure control
Pressure controlled ventilation for peak airway pressure to deliver tidal volume 10 ml/kg.
- peak airway pressure [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after prone position ]Record peak airway pressure on anesthesia mechanical ventilator after anesthesia induction and 30 minutes after prone positioning.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01272700
|Korea, Republic of|
|Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752|