Comparison of Telemedicine Evaluation to Standard Evaluation Methods for Pre-Anesthesia Consultation
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01240239|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : November 15, 2010
Last Update Posted : November 29, 2016
|Condition or disease|
|ENT Patients Scheduled for Surgery|
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Actual Enrollment :||200 participants|
|Official Title:||Comparison of Telemedicine Evaluation to Standard Evaluation Methods for Pre-Anesthesia Consultation|
|Study Start Date :||January 2010|
|Primary Completion Date :||September 2013|
|Study Completion Date :||September 2013|
The telephone group must be healthy adults scheduled for an ENT surgery.
This group if qualified will randomly be chosen to be in the telemedicine group.
This will be the group that will be randomized to the pre-anesthesia clinic.
- Comparison Of Telemedicine Evaluation To Standard Evaluation Methods For Pre-Anesthesia Consultation [ Time Frame: about 1 month ]Primary outcomes include surgical cancellation rate, delays the day of surgery secondary to inadequate pre-op evaluation, adequacy of the airway, respiratory, and cardiovascular exams, and intra-op and post-op complications. Patient data will include age, gender, ASA Physical Status and type of surgery. The length of the PACE appointment and the number of days prior to surgery the PACE appointment was conducted will be noted. Patient satisfaction with the will be evaluated.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01240239
|United States, California|
|Orange Tree Lane Otolaryngology Offices|
|Redlands, California, United States, 92374|