Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial Comparing SMILE and LASIK
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01216475|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified July 2016 by Federico Luengo Gimeno, Singapore National Eye Centre.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : October 7, 2010
Last Update Posted : July 20, 2016
Background: Small Incision Lenticule Extraction or SMILE is a novel form of 'flapless' corneal refractive surgery that was adapted from Refractive Lenticule Extraction (ReLEx). SMILE uses only one femtosecond laser to complete the refractive surgery, potentially reducing surgical time, side effects and cost. If successful, SMILE could potentially replace the current, widely practiced Laser In-situ Keratomileusis or LASIK. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether SMILE is non-inferior to LASIK in terms of refractive outcomes at 3-months post-operatively.
Methods/ Design: Single tertiary center, parallel group, single-blinded, paired-eye design, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Participants who are eligible for LASIK will be enrolled for study after informed consent. Each participant will be randomized to receive SMILE and LASIK in each eye. Our primary hypothesis (stated as null) in this non-inferiority trial would be that SMILE differs from LASIK in adults (>21 years old) with myopia (> -3.00D) at a tertiary eye center in terms of refractive predictability at 3 months post-operatively. Our secondary hypothesis (stated as null) in this non-inferiority trial would be that SMILE differs from LASIK in adults (>21 years old) with myopia (> -3.00D) at a tertiary eye center in terms of other refractive outcomes (efficacy, safety, higher-order aberrations) at 3 months post-operatively. Our primary outcome is refractive predictability, which is one of several standard refractive outcomes, defined as the proportion of eyes achieving a postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) within ±0.50 diopter (D) of the intended target. Randomization will be performed using random allocation sequence generated by a computer with no blocks or restrictions, and implemented by concealing the number-coded surgery within sealed envelopes until just before the procedure. In this single-blinded trial, subjects and their caregivers will be blinded to the assigned treatment in each eye.
Discussion: This novel trial will provide information on whether SMILE has comparable, if not superior, refractive outcomes compared to the established LASIK for myopia, thus providing evidence for translation into clinical practice.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Myopia Astigmatism Hypermetropia||Procedure: Femtosecond LASIK Procedure: Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)||Not Applicable|
Surgical correction for refractive errors may be performed by a number of procedures. Laser correction involves procedures such as EpiLASIK, LASIK or conductive keratoplasty, while lens based corrections involve the use of phakic intra-ocular lenses. Despite the emergence of other procedures, due to its fast visual rehabilitation and painless postoperative course, LASIK is still the procedure of choice for both patients and refractive surgeons.
LASIK consists of two steps: the first step involves the formation of a corneal flap and the second one is when the excimer ablation is performed in the corneal stromal bed. Femtosecond lasers (FL) have been widely used in LASIK surgery to fashion the corneal flap. The laser will cut a lamellar followed by a vertical corneal incision. We are able to produce a vertical cut since the Femtosecond laser can deliver laser pulses of 1 micron diameter at a preselected depth in the cornea, which then expands to 2 to 3 microns with the formation of a cavitation bubble. These pulses create micro-photodisruption of the corneal tissue by the formation of an expanding bubble of carbon dioxide and water, which in turn cleaves the tissue and creates a plane of separation. The flap is then removed to expose the stroma and the refractive treatment is done by the excimer laser over the denuded stroma. The advantages of femtosecond laser over microkeratome LASIK flaps have been reduced postoperative dry eye symptoms, less chance of dislocation from trauma and reduced incidence of button holes or free caps.
Even though femto-LASIK has demonstrated good efficacy, it can still be asssociated with side effects found in standard LASIK e.g. glare, haloes, dry eye and still requires the use of two laser machines, one for the flap the other for the excimer ablation. This increases the length of time of the overall procedure and the costs.
Recently, a new "one laser" refractive surgery has been proposed: Femtosecond Lenticule Ex-traction (FLEx). It consists of performing the entire refractive procedure without an excimer laser. The Femtosecond laser creates four stromal incisions to create a corneal lenticule and a corneal flap. The size and shape of the lenticule is calculated based on the patient refractive error. The lenticule is separated from the flap above and the rest of the cornea below using a small spatula. Following this, the lenticule is grasped with a forceps and extracted from the eye. Finally, the flap is repositioned and the interface washed. At this time the refractive error is already corrected without the use of a second laser.
The advantages of FLEx treatment are shortened length of the refractive procedure, reduced patient inconvenience from moving from one laser to another, reduced risk of intraoperative infections and more accurate ablation since the patient need to fixate only once.
Currently there are no publications comparing FLEx to LASIK, hence this study will be unique in the fact that the paired eye approach will act as an internal patient control to assess the objective and subjective outcomes in patients following both these procedures.
The study will be a prospective randomized trial of patients comparing SMILE (a variation of FLEx) with LASIK to treat their myopic refractive error. One eye will be randomized for SMILE and other eye for LASIK. Each procedure will be performed sequentially. Randomization will be performed by a random number generator, and assignment concealed in envelopes.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||70 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)|
|Official Title:||Comparison of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and VisuMax Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (FemtoLASIK): A Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial|
|Study Start Date :||February 2012|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||November 2016|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||September 2017|
Active Comparator: Femtosecond LASIK
2 lasers refractive procedure
Procedure: Femtosecond LASIK
LASIK consists of two steps: the first step involves the formation of a corneal flap and the second one is when the excimer ablation is performed in the corneal stromal bed. Femtosecond lasers (FL) have been widely used in LASIK surgery to fashion the corneal flap. The laser will cut a lamellar followed by a vertical corneal incision. We are able to produce a vertical cut since the Femtosecond laser can deliver laser pulses of 1 micron diameter at a preselected depth in the cornea, which then expands to 2 to 3 microns with the formation of a cavitation bubble. These pulses create micro-photodisruption of the corneal tissue by the formation of an expanding bubble of carbon dioxide and water, which in turn cleaves the tissue and creates a plane of separation. The flap is then removed to expose the stroma and the refractive treatment is done by the excimer laser over the denuded stroma.
Other Name: Blade-less LASIK
Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)
Procedure: Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)
Patient's eye will be centered and docked with the curved interface cone before application of suction fixation. First, the posterior surface of the refractive lenticule (spiral in), then the lenticule border is created. The anterior surface of the refractive lenticule (spiral out) is then formed which extended beyond the posterior lenticule diameter by 0.5mm to form the anterior flap and is followed by a rim cut. After the suction is released, a Siebel spatula is inserted under the flap near the hinge before the flap is seperated and reflected. The edge of the refractive lenticule is separated from the stromal bed with a sinsky hook and the posterior border of the lenticule gently separated with the Siebel spatula and removed through small incision.
- Refractive predictability [ Time Frame: 3 months Post-operative ]Defined as the proportion number of eyes achieving a postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) within ±0.50 diopter (D) of the intended target.
- Efficacy [ Time Frame: 3 months Post-operative ]Defined as the proportion number of eyes achieving a unaided visual acuity (UAVA) of 20/20 or better postoperatively
- Safety [ Time Frame: 3 months Post-operative ]Defined as the proportion number of eyes that lost or gained 1 or more lines of postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) relative to the preoperative BCVA
- Contrast sensitivity [ Time Frame: 3 months Post-operative ]Tested using the Vision Contrast Test System (VCTS) chart (VCTS 6500 contrast sensitivity Chart) in 6 spatial frequencies
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01216475
|Contact: Donald T Tan, FRCS(Ed),||firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: Jodhbir S Mehta, FRCS(Ed)||email@example.com|
|Singapore National Eye Centre||Recruiting|
|Singapore, Singapore, 168751|
|Contact: Jod Mehta, FRCOph 62277255 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator: Donald T Tan, FRCS (Ed)|
|Sub-Investigator: Jodhbir S Mehta, FRCS (Ed)|
|Sub-Investigator: Federico Luengo Gimeno, MD, PhD|
|Sub-Investigator: Cordelia Chan, FRCS (Ed)|
|Sub-Investigator: Marcus Ang, FRCS|
|Study Director:||Donald T Tan, FRCS(Ed),||Singapore National Eye Centre|
|Principal Investigator:||Jodhbir S Mehta, FRCS (ed)||SNEC|