We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in a Manikin With Immobilized Cervical Spine

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01210092
First Posted: September 28, 2010
Last Update Posted: September 22, 2011
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
J. Hinkelbein, University of Cologne
  Purpose
To determine whether different video laryngoscopes facilitate intubation in an manikin with immobilized cervical spine compared with standard laryngoscopy.

Condition
Tracheal Intubation

Study Type: Observational
Study Design: Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in a Manikin With Immobilized Cervical Spine

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by J. Hinkelbein, University of Cologne:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • successful tracheal intubation [ Time Frame: max 5 minutes ]

Estimated Enrollment: 25
Study Start Date: August 2010
Study Completion Date: January 2011
Primary Completion Date: November 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Groups/Cohorts
Macintosh #3 Laryngoscope
Glidescope
Ambu Pentax AWS
McGrath
Airtraq
Storz C-MAC

  Eligibility

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:   25 Years to 65 Years   (Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Sampling Method:   Probability Sample
Study Population
anaesthesiologists
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • anaesthesiologist
  • experienced in tracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • missing experience in tracheal intubation
  • missing informed consent
  Contacts and Locations
Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01210092


Locations
Germany
Department of Anaesthesiology and Postoperative Critical Care
Cologne, Germany, 50937
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Cologne
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Wolfgang A Wetsch, MD Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Cologne
  More Information

Responsible Party: J. Hinkelbein, PD Dr. med., University of Cologne
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01210092     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 10-182-2
First Submitted: September 27, 2010
First Posted: September 28, 2010
Last Update Posted: September 22, 2011
Last Verified: September 2011