We updated the design of this site on December 18, 2017. Learn more.
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Comparing Outcomes of Elbow Extension Tendon Transfers

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01204736
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 17, 2010
Results First Posted : January 7, 2016
Last Update Posted : March 8, 2016
Information provided by (Responsible Party):

Study Description
Brief Summary:
Active elbow extension has significant functional benefits for individuals with tetraplegia. The proposed work will provide information to assess how effectively people are using their elbow extension tendon transfers, and whether one surgery works more effectively than the other. This study will provide recommendations to clinicians about the possibility of improving function after surgery using rehab techniques.

Condition or disease
Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Detailed Description:

Voluntary control of elbow extension significantly improves functional abilities for individuals with tetraplegia. As a result, surgical reconstruction of elbow extension via tendon transfer is considered a fundamental intervention that benefits the patient, even if other tendon transfers aimed at improving hand function are never performed. Presently, there are two common tendon transfer surgeries used to restore elbow extension following spinal cord injury. These are the posterior deltoid to triceps transfer and the biceps to triceps transfer. Both surgeries significantly improve voluntary elbow extension, although there is variability in the amount of control that is restored among patients. This study will directly compare the performance of the posterior deltoid transfer to the biceps transfer with regard to: voluntary elbow extension strength, the ability to activate the transfer, and neural factors associated with voluntary and involuntary control of individual muscles. These comparisons will be made in functionally relevant postures and will provide fundamental information that will improve clinical understanding of the capacity of each of these two procedures to restore elbow extension.

The fundamental hypothesis of this proposal is that an inability to maximally activate the transferred posterior deltoid and the transferred biceps significantly limits the elbow extension moment that can be produced.

Study Design

Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 14 participants
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Retrospective
Official Title: A Comparison of Two Surgical Procedures That Restore Elbow Extension
Study Start Date : August 2011
Primary Completion Date : December 2014
Study Completion Date : December 2015
Groups and Cohorts

Group 1
Subjects with posterior deltoid-to-triceps tendon transfers
Group 2
Subjects with biceps-to-triceps tendon transfers
Group 3
Subjects with cervical SCI who have not had tendon transfers
Group 4
Unimpaired control subjects

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Elbow Extension Strength [ Time Frame: At least one year post surgery ]
    Elbow extension strength was measured as the maximum elbow extension moment that subject's could generate. We used an elbow moment transducer to measure elbow moments under isometric (no change in arm posture) conditions. Subjects performed three trials at maximum effort, holding maximum elbow extension for 5 to 7 seconds. The maximum moment was computed as the maximum average moment sustained over a 0.5 second window.

Eligibility Criteria

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 60 Years   (Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Three groups of subjects will be recruited to participate in the experiments: individuals that have had the posterior deltoid to triceps tendon transfer, individuals that have the biceps to triceps tendon transfer, and individuals with SCI between C5-C7 who have not had tendon transfers. Nominally, we plan to recruit 15 subjects from each group.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (C5-C7)
  • Posterior Deltoid to Triceps Tendon Transfer at least one year post-surgery
  • Biceps to Triceps Tendon Transfer at least one year post-surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will be excluded from the studies if there is presence of concurrent severe medical illness, including:

    • unhealed decubiti
    • use of baclofen pumps
    • existing infection
    • cardiovascular disease
    • significant osteoporosis (as indicated by a history of fractures following injury)
    • or a history of pulmonary complications or autonomic dysreflexia
Contacts and Locations

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01204736

United States, Illinois
Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL
Hines, Illinois, United States, 60141-5000
Sponsors and Collaborators
VA Office of Research and Development
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Northwestern University
Case Western Reserve University
Loyola University
MetroHealth System - Cleveland, OH
Principal Investigator: Wendy M Murray, PhD Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL
More Information

Responsible Party: VA Office of Research and Development
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01204736     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: B7515-R
First Posted: September 17, 2010    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: January 7, 2016
Last Update Posted: March 8, 2016
Last Verified: February 2016

Keywords provided by VA Office of Research and Development:
tendon transfer

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Spinal Cord Injuries
Spinal Cord Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Nervous System Diseases
Trauma, Nervous System
Wounds and Injuries