We're building a better ClinicalTrials.gov. Check it out and tell us what you think!
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

The Effectiveness of rTMS in Depressed VA Patients

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01191333
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : August 30, 2010
Results First Posted : February 7, 2018
Last Update Posted : March 9, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
VA Office of Research and Development

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this multi-site trial is to determine if repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) helps people with depression who have not been helped by medications or who have not been helped enough by medications.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Major Depressive Disorder Device: rTMS Device: Sham Device Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Major depression occurs in about 10% of American outpatients every year and of those, approximately 20% respond incompletely or not at all to trials of antidepressants, mood stabilizers, or psychotherapy (Kaplan and Sadock, 1996; Keller et al 1992; Thase, 2004). Treatment as usual for these cases of treatment resistant major depression (TRMD) frequently involves increased risks and increased side effects, such as those seen in monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). New TRMD treatments are needed, preferably without major safety concerns or side effects as seen with aggressive polypharmacy or ECT.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a method of delivering brain stimulation without the seizures or risks associated with ECT, nor the potential side effects and risks of MAOI therapy. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies to date, which are typically of a small scale, appear to show a positive effect in TRMD (Martin et al. 2003). With a minimal side effect profile, and the rarity of untoward events and side-effects (Pascual-Leone et al. 1993; Wassermann 1997), safety concerns regarding the use of rTMS are considerably less than with ECT. Given this, rTMS has the potential to be a significant advance in care, if it were shown to be effective in TRMD in VA patients.

The trials of rTMS performed to date have not included participants with comorbid disorders, such as substance abuse and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), thus the generalizability of their findings to a VA population is not clear. Further research including Veterans with possible comorbid disorders is necessary, given the high rates of co-occurring substance abuse and PTSD that is present in the Veteran population.

The present study is a randomized, controlled trial that compares active rTMS to a sham condition in Veterans with treatment resistant major depression and possible comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and / or a history of substance abuse. Veterans will remain under the care of their VA primary mental health provider throughout the project. Participants will be assessed at pre-, mid- and several post-treatment time points. This is a multisite trial that will be conducted at 9 VA Medical Centers around the country.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 164 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: CSP #556 - The Effectiveness of rTMS in Depressed VA Patients
Actual Study Start Date : July 2, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date : February 15, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date : March 31, 2017

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Active rTMS
Those receiving experimental treatment will receive 20 to 30 sessions of rTMS in blocks of 5 sessions. The treatment will be delivered by trained medical personnel.
Device: rTMS
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Placebo Comparator: Sham rTMS
Those receiving the sham rTMS will receive 20 to 30 sessions of sham rTMS in blocks of 5 sessions. The treatment will be delivered by trained medical personnel.
Device: Sham Device
Placebo Device that simulates active rTMS treatment




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. The Proportion of Participants Achieving Remission From Depression as Assessed by Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [ Time Frame: End of acute treatment 4-6 weeks ]
    The primary outcome is a proportion of participants achieving remission from depression based on the HRSD24 less than or equal to 10 at the end of the acute treatment phase. 24 item Instrument with overall score range from 0 - 76. High values represent a worse outcome.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Mean Suicidal Ideation Score as Assessed by Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS) [ Time Frame: End of acute treatment 4-6 weeks, then end of F/U 6 months ]
    To help clinicians screen psychiatric patients for suicidal ideation, the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation was developed, and is herein referred to as the BSS. This self-report measure consists of 21 items with overall score range from 0 - 38, with the last two items not counted in scoring. A high score represents a worse outcome.

  2. Mean Depression Score as Assessed by Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [ Time Frame: Baseline - end of acute treatment 4-6 weeks, then end of F/U 6 months ]
    This measure is a 21-item self-report test presented in a multiple choice format which measures presence and extent of depression with overall score range from 0 - 63. A higher score represents a worse outcome. Each of the 21 items addresses a specific symptom or attitude that pertains to depressed patients, and which are consistent with descriptions of the depression within the peer-reviewed literature. While generally deemed less reliable than scales score by a trained rater (for example, the HRSD), the Beck scale is easy to administer, and provides convenient means by which patients can effectively communicate their own perception of their mood state.

  3. Mean Mental Component Score as Assessed by VR-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) [ Time Frame: End of acute treatment 4-6 weeks, then end of F/U 6 months ]
    The VR-36 is a self-administered survey that measures eight dimensions of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. It yields scale scores for each of these eight health domains, and two summary measures of physical and mental health: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). MCS is analyzed in this section. Standardized scoring ranging from 0-100. A higher score represents a better outcome.

  4. Mean Physical Component Score as Assessed by VR-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) [ Time Frame: End of acute treatment 4-6 weeks, then end of F/U 6 months ]
    The VR-36 is a self-administered survey that measures eight dimensions of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. It yields scale scores for each of these eight health domains, and two summary measures of physical and mental health: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). PCS is analyzed in this section. Standardized scoring ranging from 0-100. A higher score represents a better outcome.

  5. Mean Depression Score as Assessed by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) [ Time Frame: End of acute treatment 4-6 weeks, then end of F/U 6 months ]
    As another measure of depression, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) has been used with increasing frequency in recent years to measure outcome in antidepressant efficacy trials. It offers an alternative view of depressive illness, and may be sensitive to depressive symptoms that are not easily captured in the context of the HRSD, such as hypersomnia, increased appetite, and concentration/indecision. The MADRS is a 10-item clinician rating of depressive symptoms. Each item is scored on a 7-point scale (0 to 6) (range 0-60). A high score represents a worse outcome.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 80 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 18 and 80 years of age
  • Using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) Disorders (SCID) for DSM-IV-TR (First et al. 2002) patients will be diagnosed Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).
  • Have a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-24) score greater or equal to 20 no more than 7 days prior to randomization.
  • Exhibit moderate level of resistance to antidepressant treatment defined, using the Antidepressant Treatment History Form (ATHF) (Sackeim et al. 1990), as failure of at least two adequate medication trials.
  • Duration of current episode of less than or equal to 10 years.
  • Ability to obtain a Motor Threshold (MT) (should be determined at the end of the screening process).
  • Currently under the care of a VA psychiatrist.
  • If on a psychotropic medication regimen, that regimen will be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization and patient will be willing to remain on a stable regimen during the acute treatment phase.
  • Has an adequately stable condition and environment to enable attendance at scheduled clinic visits.
  • For female participants, agrees to use one of the following acceptable methods of birth control

    • Complete abstinence (not having sexual intercourse with anyone)
    • An oral contraceptive (birth control pills)
    • Norplant
    • Depo-Provera
    • A condom with spermicide
    • A cervical cap with spermicide
    • A diaphragm with spermicide
    • An Intrauterine device
    • Surgical sterilization (having tubes tied)
  • Able to read, verbalize understanding and voluntarily sign the Informed Consent Form prior to performance of any study-specific procedures or assessments.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating female (This is an FDA-required exclusion. In the future, if rTMS becomes a proven treatment for major depression, its safety in the context of pregnancy should be studied separately (Nahas et al. 1999).
  • Unable to be safely withdrawn, at least two-weeks prior to treatment commencement, from medications that substantially increase the risk of having seizures. For the purpose of this study, those medications are listed in Appendix G (for example, theophylline).
  • Have a cardiac pacemaker.
  • Have an implanted device (deep brain stimulation) or metal in the brain.
  • Have a cochlear implant.
  • Have a mass lesion, cerebral infarct, increased intracranial pressure, or other active central nervous system (CNS) disease, including a seizure disorder.
  • Known current psychosis as determined by DSM-IV or SCID (axis I, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia) or a history of a non-mood psychotic disorder.
  • Known current Bipolar I disorder as determined by SCID or a History of Bipolar I disorder.
  • Current amnestic disorders, dementia, Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration (BOMC) greater than 10, delirium, or other cognitive disorders.
  • Current substance abuse (not including caffeine or nicotine) as determined by positive toxicology screen, or by history via SCID, within 3 months prior to screening.
  • Patients with an elevated risk of seizure due to traumatic brain injury (TBI).
  • Participation in another concurrent clinical trial.
  • Patients with prior exposure to rTMS.
  • Active current suicidal intent or plan as evidenced by a score of 4 or 5 on the suicidal ideation portion of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) or the endorsement of an actual attempt, interrupted attempt, or an aborted attempt in the past 6 months. All patients will be required to establish a written safety plan involving their primary psychiatrist and the treatment team before entering the clinical trial (See Section X.B.8).
  • Unstable cardiac disease or recent (< 3 months previous) myocardial infarction.
  • Patient refuses to sign consent for participation in the study.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01191333


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, California
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304-1290
San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, California, United States, 94121
United States, Ohio
Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45220
United States, Pennsylvania
Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15240
United States, South Carolina
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29401-5799
United States, Texas
Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX
Temple, Texas, United States, 76504
United States, Utah
VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84148
United States, Vermont
White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT
White River Junction, Vermont, United States, 05009-0001
Sponsors and Collaborators
VA Office of Research and Development
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Chair: Jerome A. Yesavage, MD VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by VA Office of Research and Development:
Study Protocol  [PDF] February 12, 2016
Statistical Analysis Plan  [PDF] January 13, 2017

Publications:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: VA Office of Research and Development
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01191333    
Other Study ID Numbers: 556
First Posted: August 30, 2010    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: February 7, 2018
Last Update Posted: March 9, 2018
Last Verified: February 2018
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: No
Keywords provided by VA Office of Research and Development:
Mood Disorder
Depression
stress disorder, post-traumatic
Depressive Disorder
Stress Disorders, Traumatic
substance related disorders
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, repetitive
transcranial magnetic stimulation
Veterans
mental health
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder
Depression
Depressive Disorder, Major
Mood Disorders
Mental Disorders
Behavioral Symptoms