We updated the design of this site on September 25th. Learn more.

Linking Altered Central Pain Processing and Genetic Polymorphism to Drug Efficacy in Chronic Low Back Pain (Predictio) (Predictio)

This study has been completed.

Sponsor:

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:

NCT01179828

First Posted: August 11, 2010

Last Update Posted: April 6, 2016

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.

Collaborators:

University of Bern

University of Zurich

Aalborg University

Information provided by:

University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Purpose

Drug therapy in patients with chronic low back pain is a major challenge for physicians. One of the problems is the lacking knowledge in prediction of drug efficacy in a chosen patient. Usually one of the classes of pain medication is given to patients with a similar clinical picture, although different pain mechanisms may be responsible for this clinical picture.

Another reason for variable drug efficacy are genetic polymorphisms, this may be the reason why an unique drug produces different responses (from a lacking analgesic effect up to excessive effect or side-effects.

Quantitative sensory testing is a method that documents alterations in the pain perception system. Linking genetic polymorphisms to quantitative sensory testing may give us a tool for anticipation of drug efficacy.

Condition	Intervention	Phase
Low Back Pain	Drug: Oxycodone 15mg Drug: Clobazam Drug: Imipramine Drug: Tolterodine	Phase 3


Study Type:	Interventional
Study Design:	Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Basic Science
Official Title:	Linking Altered Central Pain Processing and Genetic Polymorphism to Drug Efficacy in Chronic Low Back Pain

Resource links provided by NLM:

MedlinePlus related topics: Back Pain

U.S. FDA Resources

Further study details as provided by University Hospital Inselspital, Berne:

Primary Outcome Measures:

Difference in NRS(pain scale) between measurement after and before drug administration [ Time Frame: 07/2012 ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:

Patients global impression of change scale after drug administration [ Time Frame: 07/2012 ]
Pharmacogenetic variables(see before) [ Time Frame: 07/2012 ]
Pharmacokinetics: measure of Imipramine and desipramine blood levels [ Time Frame: 07/2012 ]
Reliability of repeated quantitative sensory testing in the same patient [ Time Frame: 12/2010 ]


Enrollment:	150
Study Start Date:	July 2010
Study Completion Date:	December 2015
Primary Completion Date:	April 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Arms	Assigned Interventions
Active Comparator: 1 Oxycodone 15mg	Drug: Oxycodone 15mg 15mg single administration p.o.
Active Comparator: 2 Clobazam 20mg	Drug: Clobazam 20mg single administration p.o.
Active Comparator: 3 Imipramine 75mg	Drug: Imipramine 75mg single administration p.o.
Placebo Comparator: 4 Tolterodine 1mg	Drug: Tolterodine 1 mg single administration p.o.

Detailed Description:

Background

Drug therapy is an essential part of pain treatment. However, only a minor part of pain patients benefits from the available treatments or is able to tolerate the drugs. One important limitation of drug therapy is lack of instruments to predict their effect. Indeed, in clinical practice "classes" of drugs (e.g. antidepressants) are given to "classes" of patients (e.g. neuropathic pain patients). However, within those classes of patients very different pain mechanisms are likely to underlie the pain condition in different patients. If drugs affect part of these mechanisms, they will not work in all patients. Another reason for variability in drug responses is genetic variation leading to a spectrum of different responses to analgesics, from lack of efficacy to exaggerated responses, up to intolerable adverse effects.

Quantitative sensory testing comprises methods that document alterations and reorganization of the nociceptive system. Measuring an abnormal result in a chronic pain patient may provide us with the information that the underlying pain pathways somehow must be altered. An essential question is whether this information can be linked to drug efficacy in a mechanism-based treatment approach. A further important question is whether assessing genetic polymorphisms can explain different drug effects and hence help selecting the appropriate therapeutic strategy for individual patients.

Objective

We will test the hypothesis that there is a correlation between disturbances in specific pain mechanisms as assessed by quantitative sensory tests and analgesic efficacy after single-dose drug administration in patients with chronic low back pain. Genetic factors affecting drug metabolism and pain sensitivity will be analyzed as additional explanatory variables for drug efficacy.

Methods

Quantitative sensory testing: Heat pain threshold and tolerance, Ice water testing with central modulation of nociceptive input (DNIC), electrical pain detection and temporal summation (skin probe), pressure algometry with pain detection and threshold Drugs investigated: Imipramine, Oxycodone, Clobazam Blood samples: pharmacogenetics: Cytochrome variants CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, COMT haplotypes, CGH-1 variants, A118G of mu opioid receptor gene variants pharmacokinetics: kinetics of imipramine and desipramine

Eligibility

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:	18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:	All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:	No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Low back pain with NRS>2
Chronic low back pain since more than 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

pregnancy
use of pain medication other than paracetamol and ibuprofen in the last 7 days
suspicion of radicular pain
suspicion of intervertebral disk herniation
foraminal intervertebral stenosis
suspicion of polyneuropathy
diabetes
parkinson disease
alzheimer disease
glaucoma
prostata hyperplasia or voiding problems
known heart rhythm problems
heart insufficiency NYHA 3-4
Systemic inflammatory disease
Ongoing oncologic disease
drug or alcohol abuse
Significant depressive disease (BDI-FS>9)

Contacts and Locations

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01179828

Locations


Switzerland
Andreas Siegenthaler
Dep. of Anesthesiolgy and Pain therapy, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland, 3010 Bern

Sponsors and Collaborators

University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

University of Bern

University of Zurich

Aalborg University

Investigators


Study Chair:	Michele Curatolo, Prof	University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
Study Director:	Andreas Siegenthaler, Dr Med	University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
Principal Investigator:	Pascal H Vuilleumier, Dr Med	University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

More Information

Publications:

Arendt-Nielsen L, Yarnitsky D. Experimental and clinical applications of quantitative sensory testing applied to skin, muscles and viscera. J Pain. 2009 Jun;10(6):556-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Apr 19. Review.

Foulkes T, Wood JN. Pain genes. PLoS Genet. 2008 Jul 25;4(7):e1000086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000086. Review.

Curatolo M, Arendt-Nielsen L, Petersen-Felix S. Central hypersensitivity in chronic pain: mechanisms and clinical implications. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2006 May;17(2):287-302. Review.

Markenson JA, Croft J, Zhang PG, Richards P. Treatment of persistent pain associated with osteoarthritis with controlled-release oxycodone tablets in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin J Pain. 2005 Nov-Dec;21(6):524-35.

Saarto T, Wiffen PJ. Antidepressants for neuropathic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD005454. Review.

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):

Siegenthaler A, Schliessbach J, Vuilleumier PH, Juni P, Zeilhofer HU, Arendt-Nielsen L, Curatolo M. Linking altered central pain processing and genetic polymorphism to drug efficacy in chronic low back pain. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015 Sep 16;16:23. doi: 10.1186/s40360-015-0023-z.


Responsible Party:	Dr Med Andreas Siegenthaler, Inselspital Bern
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT01179828 History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers:	KEK 213/09 grant: SPUM no. 33CM30_124117
First Submitted:	August 10, 2010
First Posted:	August 11, 2010
Last Update Posted:	April 6, 2016
Last Verified:	April 2016

Keywords provided by University Hospital Inselspital, Berne:


Quantitative sensory testing Drug efficacy Low back pain syndrome Imipramine	Oxycodone Clobazam Tolterodine

Additional relevant MeSH terms:


Back Pain Low Back Pain Pain Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases Signs and Symptoms Oxycodone Tolterodine Tartrate Imipramine Clobazam Analgesics, Opioid Narcotics Central Nervous System Depressants Physiological Effects of Drugs Analgesics	Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Muscarinic Antagonists Cholinergic Antagonists Cholinergic Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Urological Agents Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic Antidepressive Agents Psychotropic Drugs Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors Membrane Transport Modulators Adrenergic Agents

To Top