Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Study of the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Adalimumab in Subjects With Intermediate-, Posterior-, or Pan-uveitis (VISUAL III)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01148225
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 22, 2010
Results First Posted : April 4, 2019
Last Update Posted : April 4, 2019
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
AbbVie

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term efficacy and safety of adalimumab participants with non-infectious intermediate-, posterior- or pan-uveitis.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Uveitis Drug: adalimumab Phase 3

Detailed Description:
This study was initially planned to run for 78 weeks but was extended for ethical reasons, to avoid leaving participants untreated who had responded well to adalimumab treatment, so that participants were allowed to remain in the study until regulatory and/or reimbursement approval for the treatment of uveitis in adults was obtained for their respective countries. Data were collected through Week 366 (maximum), but because of decreasing sample size that became too small toward the end of the study to allow for meaningful conclusion, data cut off for efficacy analyses (intent to treat [ITT] population) occurred at Week 246, as less than 10% of participants in the ITT set had visits beyond this timepoint.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 424 participants
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Multicenter Open-Label Study of the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of the Human Anti-TNF Monoclonal Antibody Adalimumab in Subjects With Non-infectious Intermediate Uveitis, Posterior Uveitis, or Panuveitis
Actual Study Start Date : November 23, 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date : May 21, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date : May 21, 2018


Arm Intervention/treatment
Adalimumab
Participants received open label (OL) adalimumab 40 mg by subcutaneous (SC) injection every other week (eow) until the final visit.
Drug: adalimumab
Adalimumab, pre-filled syringe, administered by SC injection
Other Names:
  • ABT-D2E7
  • Humira




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events [ Time Frame: Baseline to Final Visit (up to 366 weeks) ]
    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assessed the relationship of each event to the use of study drug as either probably related, possibly related, probably not related or not related. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent events (TEAEs/TESAEs) are defined as any event with an onset date on or after the first dose of study drug and up to 70 days after the last dose. See the Adverse Event section for details.

  2. Hematology: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Values [ Time Frame: Baseline to Final Visit (Up to 366 weeks) ]
    PCS laboratory values were defined as Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0 ≥ Grade 3. Abbreviations used include g=grams; L=liters.

  3. Chemistry: Number of Participants With PCS Values [ Time Frame: Baseline to Final Visit (Up to 366 weeks) ]
    PCS laboratory values were defined as Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0 ≥ Grade 3. Abbreviations include ALT/SGPT=alanine aminotransferase/serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase; AST/SGOT=aspartate aminotransferase/serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase; g/L=grams/liter; mmol/L=millimoles/liter; ULN=upper limit of normal.

  4. Pulse (Sitting): Mean Change (Beats Per Minute) From Baseline To Final Visit [ Time Frame: Baseline to Final Visit (Up to 366 weeks) ]
    Heart rate (beats per minute) was measured while the participant was sitting.

  5. Respiratory Rate (Sitting): Mean Change (Respirations Per Minute) From Baseline To Final Visit [ Time Frame: Baseline to Final Visit (Up to 366 weeks) ]
    Respiratory rate (respirations per minute) was measured while the participant was sitting.

  6. Temperature (Sitting): Mean Change (Centigrade) From Baseline To Final Visit [ Time Frame: Baseline to Final Visit (Up to 366 weeks) ]
    Temperature was measured while the participant was sitting.

  7. Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure (Sitting): Mean Change (mmHg) From Baseline To Final Visit [ Time Frame: Baseline to Final Visit (Up to 366 weeks) ]
    Blood pressure was measured while the participant was sitting. Abbreviations used include mmHg=millimeters of mercury.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Percentage of Participants in Quiescence Over Time [ Time Frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Quiescence is defined as no active inflammatory lesions and anterior chamber (AC) cell grade ≤ 0.5+ and vitreous haze (VH) grade ≤0.5+. Participants with active uveitis at study entry could have been in quiescence at Week 0 because all participants were evaluated for uveitis status at the Final/Early Termination visit of the lead-in study and the Week 0 visit could have occurred up to 28 days later during which time the participant's disease status may have changed.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Uveitis Flare Among Participants With Inactive Uveitis at Study Start [ Time Frame: 366 Weeks ]
    Uveitis flare is defined as no quiescence (active inflammatory lesions and AC cell grade > 0.5+ and/or VH grade >0.5+).

  3. Percentage of Participants With Uveitis Flare From Week 8 Through Last Visit Among Participants With Active Uveitis at Study Start [ Time Frame: Weeks 8 to 246 (238 Weeks) ]
    Uveitis flare is defined as no quiescence (active inflammatory lesions and AC cell grade > 0.5+ and/or VH grade >0.5+).

  4. Percentage of Participants With New Active Inflammatory Lesions or Grade ≥2 in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cells or Grade ≥2 in Vitreous Haze (VH) Over Time [ Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy is performed to determine both vitreous haze grading and the absence/presence of inflammatory chorioretinal and/or inflammatory retinal vascular lesions. The number of AC cells observed within a 1 mm * 1 mm slit beam was recorded for each eye and this number was used to determine the grade according to Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria. Grading of VH was based on the National Eye Institute (NEI) publication which was adapted by the SUN working group. The percentage of participants with new active inflammatory lesions or grade ≥2 in AC cells or grade ≥2 in VH are presented.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Steroid-free Quiescence Over Time [ Time Frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Steroid-free quiescence is defined as no active inflammatory lesions and AC cell grade ≤ 0.5+ and VH grade ≤0.5+ and no uveitis-related corticosteroids on the day of assessment.

  6. Percentage of Participants in Non-quiescence (With/Without Change in Concomitant Medications Within 5 Days and With/Without Quiescence at Next Visit at Least 8 Weeks After Non-quiescence) Among Participants With Inactive Uveitis at Study Start [ Time Frame: 366 Weeks ]
    Percentage of participants, without quiescence, with/without change in concomitant medications within 5 days after non-quiescence and with/without quiescence at next visit at least 8 weeks after non-quiescence among participants with inactive uveitis at study start. Quiescence is defined as no active inflammatory lesions and AC cell grade ≤ 0.5+ and VH grade ≤0.5+. Abbreviations used are as follows: CM=concomitant medications; NQ=non-quiescence.

  7. Percentage of Participants in Non-quiescence (With/Without Change in Concomitant Medications Within 5 Days and With/Without Quiescence at Next Visit at Least 8 Weeks After Non-quiescence) Among Participants With Active Uveitis at Study Start [ Time Frame: 366 Weeks ]
    Percentage of participants, without quiescence, with/without change in concomitant medications within 5 days after non-quiescence and with/without quiescence at next visit at least 8 weeks after non-quiescence, among participants with active uveitis at study start. Quiescence is defined as no active inflammatory lesions and AC cell grade ≤ 0.5+ and VH grade ≤0.5+. Abbreviations used include: CM=concomitant medications, NQ=non-quiescence.

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Started Uveitis-related Systemic Corticosteroids During the Study [ Time Frame: 366 Weeks ]
    Percentage of participants who started uveitis-related systemic corticosteroids during the study.

  9. Mean Daily Dose in Milligrams (mg) of Uveitis-related Systemic Corticosteroids in Participants With Active Uveitis Over Time [ Time Frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Corticosteroid doses were converted into prednisone equivalents. Participants with uveitis-related systemic corticosteroid that could not be converted to prednisone equivalents were excluded. Individual mean daily doses were calculated within the respective visit windows. For Week 0, only uveitis-related systemic corticosteroids at Baseline (Day 1 for all participants) were considered. Baseline was defined as Week 0 for all participants.

  10. Mean Daily Dose (mg) of Uveitis-related Systemic Corticosteroids in Participants With Inactive Uveitis Over Time [ Time Frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Corticosteroid doses were converted into prednisone equivalents. Participants with uveitis-related systemic corticosteroid that could not be converted to prednisone equivalents were excluded. Individual mean daily doses were calculated within the respective visit windows. For Week 0, only uveitis-related systemic corticosteroids at Baseline (Day 1 for all participants) were considered. Baseline was defined as Week 0 for all participants.

  11. Percent Change in Mean Daily Dose of Uveitis-related Systemic Corticosteroids Relative to Week 0 in Participants With Inactive Uveitis Using Systemic Corticosteroids at Week 0 Over Time [ Time Frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, and 198 ]
    Corticosteroid doses were converted into prednisone equivalents. Participants with uveitis-related systemic corticosteroid that could not be converted to prednisone equivalents were excluded. Individual mean daily doses were calculated within the respective visit windows. For Week 0, only uveitis-related systemic corticosteroids at Baseline (Day 1 for all participants) were considered. Baseline was defined as Week 0 for all participants. Data not presented after Week 198 as no participants remained on study as of Week 198.

  12. Percent Change in Mean Daily Dose of Uveitis-related Systemic Corticosteroids Relative to Week 0 in Participants With Active Uveitis Using Systemic Corticosteroids at Week 0 Over Time [ Time Frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Corticosteroid doses were converted into prednisone equivalents. Participants with uveitis-related systemic corticosteroid that could not be converted to prednisone equivalents were excluded. Individual mean daily doses were calculated within the respective visit windows. For Week 0, only uveitis-related systemic corticosteroids at Baseline (Day 1 for all participants) were considered. Baseline was defined as Week 0 for all participants.

  13. Percentage of Participants Not Using Systemic Corticosteroids Over Time [ Time Frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Corticosteroid doses were converted into prednisone equivalents. Participants with uveitis-related systemic corticosteroid that could not be converted to prednisone equivalents were excluded. Individual mean daily doses were calculated within the respective visit windows. For Week 0, only uveitis-related systemic corticosteroids at Baseline (Day 1 for all participants) were considered. Baseline was defined as Week 0 for all participants. Data presented for participants not using systemic corticosteroids at each timepoint.

  14. Percentage of Participants Without Worsening of Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by ≥15 Letters on Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) in Both Eyes Relative to Baseline Over Time Among Participants Who Had Inactive Uveitis at Study Entry [ Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Percentage of participants at each study time point without a worsening of Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by ≥15 letters on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) in both eyes relative to Baseline for participants who had inactive uveitis when they entered the study.

  15. Percentage of Participants Without Worsening of BCVA by ≥15 Letters on the ETDRS in Both Eyes Relative to Week 8 Over Time Among Participants With Active Uveitis at Study Entry [ Time Frame: Weeks 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Percentage of participants at each study time point without a worsening of BCVA by ≥15 letters on the ETDRS in both eyes relative to Week 8 for participant who had active uveitis when they entered the study.

  16. Mean of Both Eyes of the Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) BCVA Over Time [ Time Frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Using corrective lenses based on that visit's refraction testing, participant's BCVA was measured using an ETDRS logMAR chart. On the logMAR scale, 0 is equivalent to 20/20 visual acuity, the range of normal vision is considered to be from -0.2 to 0.1; higher values indicate visual impairment. Data presented includes the mean of both eyes for all participants (active or inactive uveitis) for all study time points.


Other Outcome Measures:
  1. Percent Change in Left Eye in Central Retinal Thickness (1 mm Subfield) From Baseline to Each Study Time Point Relative to Baseline for Participants Who Had Inactive Uveitis at Study Entry Over Time [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Central retinal thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and assessed by a central reader. Percent change in left eye from baseline (Week 0) to each study time point relative to baseline for participants who had inactive uveitis at study entry is presented.

  2. Percent Change in Right Eye in Central Retinal Thickness (1 mm Subfield) From Baseline to Each Study Time Point Relative to Baseline for Participants Who Had Inactive Uveitis at Study Entry Over Time [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Central retinal thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and assessed by a central reader. Percent change in right eye from baseline (Week 0) to each study time point relative to baseline for participants who had inactive uveitis at study entry is presented.

  3. Percent Change in Left Eye of Central Retinal Thickness (1 mm Subfield) at Each Study Time Point Relative to Week 8 for Participants Who Had Active Uveitis at Study Entry Over Time [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 8) and Weeks 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Central retinal thickness was measured using OCT and assessed by a central reader. Percent change in left eye at each study time point relative to Week 8 (baseline) for participants who had active uveitis at study entry is presented.

  4. Percent Change in Right Eye of Central Retinal Thickness (1 mm Subfield) at Each Study Time Point Relative to Week 8 for Participants Who Had Active Uveitis at Study Entry Over Time [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 8) and Weeks 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Central retinal thickness was measured using OCT and assessed by a central reader. Percent change in right eye at each study time point relative to Week 8 (baseline) for participants who had active uveitis at study entry is presented.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Grade ≤0.5+ in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cells in Both Eyes on Slit Lamp Exam According to Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Criteria Over Time [ Time Frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Slit lamp examinations were conducted at each visit to assess AC cell count. The number of AC cells observed within a 1 mm * 1 mm slit beam was used to determine the grade according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria: Grade 0: ˂ 1 cell; Grade 0.5+: 1 - 5 cells; Grade 1+: 6 - 15 cells; Grade 2+: 16 - 25 cells; Grade 3+: 26 - 50 cells; and Grade 4+: ≥ 50 cells.

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥50% Reduction in Immunosuppression Load Relative to Baseline Over Time Among Participants With Inactive Uveitis at Study Entry [ Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, and 234 ]
    Immunosuppression load was assessed using a weighted semiquantitative scale, applying grades ranging from 0 to 9 for each immunosuppressive agent on a scale for the total daily dose in milligrams per kilogram per day or per week if dosed weekly. A higher score indicating a higher immunosuppression load and a lower or decreased score indicated improvement or less need for immunosuppressive therapy. The grading scheme was used to accommodate the simultaneous use of multiple agents and provided a combined, single numeric score for the total immunosuppression load per unit body weight per day at each visit. For participants receiving multiple medications, the sum of the grading scores for each drug was used to calculate a total immunosuppression score at each visit. Data not presented after Week 234 as no participants remained on study as of Week 234.

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥50% Reduction in Immunosuppression Load Relative to Week 8 Over Time Among Participants With Active Uveitis at Study Entry [ Time Frame: Weeks 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Immunosuppression load was assessed using a weighted semiquantitative scale, applying grades ranging from 0 to 9 for each immunosuppressive agent on a scale for the total daily dose in milligrams per kilogram per day or per week if dosed weekly. A higher score indicating a higher immunosuppression load and a lower or decreased score indicated improvement or less need for immunosuppressive therapy. The grading scheme was used to accommodate the simultaneous use of multiple agents and provided a combined, single numeric score for the total immunosuppression load per unit body weight per day at each visit. For participants receiving multiple medications, the sum of the grading scores for each drug was used to calculate a total immunosuppression score at each visit.

  8. Percentage of Participants With No New Active, Inflammatory Chorioretinal or Inflammatory Retinal Vascular Lesion in Both Eyes Relative to Baseline Over Time Among Participants With Inactive Uveitis at Study Entry [ Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Percentage of participants at each study time point with no new active, inflammatory chorioretinal or inflammatory retinal vascular lesion in both eyes relative to Baseline for participants who had inactive uveitis when they entered the study.

  9. Percentage of Participants With No New Active, Inflammatory Chorioretinal or Inflammatory Retinal Vascular Lesion in Both Eyes Relative to Week 8 Over Time Among Participants With Active Uveitis at Study Entry [ Time Frame: Weeks 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    Percentage of participants at each study time point with no new active, inflammatory chorioretinal or inflammatory retinal vascular lesion in both eyes relative to Week 8 for participants who had active uveitis when they entered the study.

  10. Percentage of Participants With Grade ≤0.5+ in VH in Both Eyes on Indirect Ophthalmoscopy According to NEI/SUN Criteria Over Time [ Time Frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]

    Vitreous haze was measured using dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy (DIO) and assessed by the Investigator according to NEI and SUN criteria:

    Grade 0: No evident vitreous haze; Grade 0.5+: Slight blurring of the optic disc margin because of the haze; normal striations and reflex of the nerve fiber layer cannot be visualized; Grade 1+: Permits a better definition of both the optic nerve head and the retinal vessels (compared to higher grades); Grade 2+: Permits better visualization of the retinal vessels (compared to higher grades); Grade 3+: Permits the observer to see the optic nerve head, but the borders are quite blurry; Grade 4+: Optic nerve head is obscured.


  11. Change in National Eye Institute (NEI) Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ-25) Score at Each Study Time Point Relative to Baseline for Participants Who Had Inactive Uveitis at Study Entry Over Time [ Time Frame: Weeks 0, 8, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    The National Eye Institute (NEI) Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ-25) is an ocular disease-specific survey that measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on generic health domains such as emotional well-being and social functioning, in addition to task-oriented domains related to daily visual functioning.The VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions plus an additional single-item general health rating question. The overall composite score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores or increases in score indicate better vision-related functioning. Baseline was defined as Week 0 for participants with inactive uveitis.

  12. Change in NEI VFQ-25 Score at Each Study Time Point Relative to Week 8 for Participants Who Had Active Uveitis at Study Entry Over Time [ Time Frame: Weeks 0, 8, 18, 30, 42, 54, 66, 78, 90, 102, 114, 126, 138, 150, 162, 174, 186, 198, 210, 222, 234, and 246 ]
    The National Eye Institute (NEI) Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ-25) is an ocular disease-specific survey that measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on generic health domains such as emotional well-being and social functioning, in addition to task-oriented domains related to daily visual functioning.The VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions plus an additional single-item general health rating question. The overall composite score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores or increases in score indicate better vision-related functioning. Baseline was defined as Week 8 for participants with active uveitis.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant must have successfully enrolled in either study M10-877 or M10-880 and either met the endpoint of "Treatment Failure" or completed the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A participant will be excluded from this study if the participant discontinued from study M10-877 or M10-880 for any reasons other than having a Treatment Failure event
  • Participant with corneal or lens opacity that precludes visualization of the fundus or that likely requires cataract surgery during the duration of the trial
  • Participants with intraocular pressure of >= 25 mmHg and on >= 2 glaucoma medications or evidence of glaucomatous optic nerve injury
  • Participant with proliferative or severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema due to diabetic retinopathy
  • Participant with neovascular/wet age-related macular degeneration
  • Participant with abnormality of vitreo-retinal interface (i.e., vitreomacular traction, epiretinal membranes, etc.) with the potential for macular structural damage independent of the inflammatory process
  • Participant with a systemic inflammatory disease that requires therapy with a prohibited immunosuppressive agent at the time of study entry

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01148225


Sponsors and Collaborators
AbbVie
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: AbbVie Inc. AbbVie
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by AbbVie:
Study Protocol  [PDF] June 4, 2015
Statistical Analysis Plan  [PDF] July 7, 2016


Additional Information:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: AbbVie
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01148225     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: M11-327
2009-016196-29 ( EudraCT Number )
First Posted: June 22, 2010    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: April 4, 2019
Last Update Posted: April 4, 2019
Last Verified: March 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by AbbVie:
Intermediate-Uveitis
Non-infectious Uveitis
Posterior-Uveitis
Active Uveitis
Pan-uveitis
Uveitis
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Uveitis
Panuveitis
Uveal Diseases
Eye Diseases
Adalimumab
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Antirheumatic Agents