Lead Migration in Spinal Cord Stimulation Trials: Comparing Non-suture vs Suture and Lead Anchor
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01126983|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : May 20, 2010
Last Update Posted : July 9, 2010
To assess lead migration rates using different methods of securing leads during Spinal Cord Stimulation trial period.
Spinal cord stimulation has two phases. Trial, which is a precursor for a permanent implantation. Trial lasts less than a week, which gives the patient an opportunity to assess the effectiveness of the treatment.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Spinal Cord Stimulation||Device: Suture Device: Lead Anchor||Not Applicable|
Lead migration has been a known issue/complication with spinal cord stimulation. Lead migration during the trial period can alter the success of a trial. There is no one way of securing the leads to the skin.
Our endeavor was to look at different modes of securing the leads to the skin during the trial period and present their respective lead migration rates. The three methods are
- suturing the leads using 2.0 mono-filament nylon to the skin,
- suture (2.0 mono-filament nylon)over the lead anchor(St.Jude Med Co. long, model # 1106) attaching them to the skin,
- non- suture.
In all three groups copious amounts of benzoin and steri-strips will be used.
Fluoroscopy pictures were taken after the leads were inserted and the level of the leads will be marked. After the trial period, before the leads were removed, an AP/lateral plain X-ray was taken and compared to the fluoroscopy pictures taken at the time of lead placement.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||50 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Primary Purpose:||Supportive Care|
|Official Title:||Lead Migration in Spinal Cord Stimulation Trials: Comparing Non-suture vs Suture and Lead Anchor Securing Methods: A Randomized Single Blind Clinical Trial for Better Outcomes.|
|Study Start Date :||May 2010|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||June 2010|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||July 2010|
No suture will be used to secure the leads. Benzoin and Steri-Strips will be used like in the other two arms.
Suture (2.0 Mono-filament nylon suture) will be used to secure the leads to the skin. Benzoin and Steri-strips will also be used.
Other Name: 2.0 Mono-filament nylon sutureDevice: Lead Anchor
Suture (2.0 Mono-filament Nylon suture) will be applied over the lead anchor(Lead Anchor St.Jude Medical Co, model-long, No# 1106) to the skin. Benzion and Steri-strips will also be used.
Other Name: 2.0 Mono-filament Nylon suture & Lead Anchor (St.Jude Medical Co) model-long, No# 1106
- Migration of leads with different methods of securing leads during spinal cord stimulation trial period. [ Time Frame: 3-5 days ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01126983
|United States, Oklahoma|
|Spine Care of Oklahoma|
|Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73112|
|Principal Investigator:||Edward Shadid, M.D||Spine Care of Oklahoma|