Try our beta test site
IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...

Effects of Cognitive Training on Academic Task Performance in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (Cog-RAST)

The recruitment status of this study is unknown. The completion date has passed and the status has not been verified in more than two years.
Verified May 2010 by University of California, Davis.
Recruitment status was:  Recruiting
Information provided by:
University of California, Davis Identifier:
First received: April 30, 2010
Last updated: May 13, 2010
Last verified: May 2010
Impaired WM is a central deficit in ADHD. A computerized training program, Cogmed, has been shown to increase WM capacity in children with ADHD. It is not known whether the training improves behavior associated with classroom learning, such as remaining on-task and inhibiting off- task behavior. The aim of this study is to utilize ecologically valid measures to investigate training's effect on observable ADHD behavior in conjunction with more standard measures. Subjects will be randomly assigned to a Cogmed versus an active "placebo" condition in which the tasks do not increase in difficulty level in a double-blinded fashion. The effects of the active Cogmed versus placebo computer training will be compared on measures in children with ADHD.

Condition Intervention
Behavioral: Cognitive training
Behavioral: Cognitive training-placebo

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Pilot Testing of Cognitive Training on Academic Task Performance in Children With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Resource links provided by NLM:

Further study details as provided by University of California, Davis:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Restricted Academic Situations Task [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ]
    Assessment of on-task type behavior while doing a simulated academic task.

  • Working memory measures [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ]
    Assess memory and working memory functioning on computer and or RA administered tests.

  • Rating scales [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ]
    Parent and teacher ratings of behavior and attention

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Fluency and attention measures [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ]
    Measures of fluency and attentional functioning.

  • Self-control and executive functioning measures [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ]
    Attention and working memory components can affect delay discounting and self-control measures. This measure will assess for change in behavior and ratings associated with executive functioning.

Estimated Enrollment: 100
Study Start Date: January 2008
Estimated Study Completion Date: January 2013
Estimated Primary Completion Date: January 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: Cogmed cognitive training
Computerized working memory, attention and cognitive tasks
Behavioral: Cognitive training
Cognitive computerized training for several days per week.
Other Name: Cogmed
Active Comparator: Active placebo
Cognitive training, however the training does not increase in difficulty, or does so to a minimal degree.
Behavioral: Cognitive training-placebo
Cognitive training that only minimally increases in difficulty
Other Name: Cogmed placebo


Ages Eligible for Study:   7 Years to 14 Years   (Child)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age range 7-14
  2. At least average academic and intellectual functioning via parent report.
  3. Must have ADHD (by parent report of previous diagnosis or per telephone screening checklist - to be confirmed via interview and ratings)
  4. Attentional, hyperactive or impulsive symptoms that interfere with functioning.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of severe mental illness for example, psychotic, bipolar or major depressive disorder, (by history)
  2. Mental retardation (by history)
  3. English is not the primary language
  4. Family does not have a computer
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its identifier: NCT01124721

Contact: Julie Schweitzer, PhD 916-703-0450

United States, California
UCaliforniaDavis MIND Institute Recruiting
Sacramento, California, United States, 95825
Contact: Kyle Rutledge   
Sub-Investigator: Catherine Fassbender, PhD         
Sub-Investigator: Faye Dixon, PhD         
Sub-Investigator: Chloe Green, BA         
Sub-Investigator: David Green, PhD         
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of California, Davis
Principal Investigator: Julie Schweitzer, PhD University of California, Davis
  More Information

Responsible Party: Julie Schweitzer, Ph.D., UCaliforniaDavis Identifier: NCT01124721     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 200816598
Study First Received: April 30, 2010
Last Updated: May 13, 2010

Keywords provided by University of California, Davis:
Cognitive training

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders
Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Mental Disorders processed this record on May 25, 2017