Secretin-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (S-MRI) for Pancreatic Cancer Detection
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01094626|
Recruitment Status : Withdrawn (Pharmaceutical company did not decide to renew contract)
First Posted : March 29, 2010
Last Update Posted : June 10, 2016
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment|
|Pancreatic Cancer Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm||Drug: Secretin|
Pancreatic cancer remains the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States and is marked by advanced stage at diagnosis and a high mortality rate. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a cystic lesion that can be potentially cancerous, leading to pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Currently, there is no existing imaging modality that is both sensitive and cost-effective enough in accurately measuring or detecting adenocarcinoma and IPMN. Improving the methods used in identification and localization of this disease is critical.
Secretin, a hormone produced by duodenal mucosal cells increases blood-flow to the pancreas. The investigators' hypothesis is that as secretin increases blood flow to the pancreas, there will be increased conspicuity in areas of dysplasia/cancer where there is minimal blood-flow, enhancing tumor detection. The investigators are conducting a prospective, randomized-control pilot study of thirty subjects with IPMN or pancreatic cancer who are undergoing surgical resection at Columbia University's Pancreas Center. Fifteen subjects will be randomly selected to undergo S-MRI prior to surgery and fifteen subjects will be selected as controls, undergoing MRI without secretin-enhancement and matched for age, sex, race and tumor-type. The investigators will first evaluate if secretin allows for increased tumor conspicuity, enhanced visualization of the lesion, by comparing the calculated tumor conspicuity of S-MRI to N-MRI groups.
The investigators will then assess if S-MRI imaging allows for increased accuracy in lesion measurements by looking at the concordance in measurements between S-MRI and tumor specimens post-resection as compared to the concordance in measurements between N-MRI and tumor specimens post-resection.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||0 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||MRI With Secretin Enhancement to Increase Conspicuity of Pancreatic Cancer|
|Study Start Date :||April 2010|
|Primary Completion Date :||March 2013|
|Study Completion Date :||March 2013|
Fifteen subjects will be randomly selected to undergo S-MRI prior to surgery. These subjects would receive Secretin, administered by IV bolus injection over 1 minute followed by a 30 second saline flush.
Subjects will each undergo an S-MRI evaluation, at a dose of 0.2 ucg/kg per exam. Secretin will be administered by IV bolus injection over 1 minute followed by a 30 second saline flush. The maximum dose of secretin will be 18.5 ucg.
Other Name: RG1068
No Intervention: Controls
Fifteen subjects will be selected as controls, undergoing MRI without secretin-enhancement and matched for age, sex, race and tumor-type.
- Difference in lesion conspicuity between S-MRI and N-MRI [ Time Frame: 30 days ]The primary outcome is whether S-MRI allows for better tumor detection secondary to anticipated increased conspicuity of tumor due to secretin's effect on increasing blood flow to the normal pancreas as compared to N-MRI. Determining S-MRI's efficacy versus that of N-MRI will be carried out by comparing tumor conspicuity measurements in S-MRI and N-MRI groups. Tumor conspicuity will be measured by calculating the contrast to noise ratio, placing region of interest (ROI) on tumor and adjacent tissue and dividing by image noise.
- Concordance of tumor measurements between S-MRI images and tumor specimens post-resection vs. concordance of tumor measurements between N-MRI and tumor specimens post-resection [ Time Frame: 45 days ]The secondary outcome will be the discrepancy in tumor size estimated from MRI and "confirmed" from post-surgical specimens. Tumor size estimated from MRI scans will be determined by measuring the greatest linear dimension (metric) of the lesion. Tumor size estimated by pathology will be directly measured using a linear scale (metric), taking the greatest linear dimension of the resected tumor. The discrepancy in estimated versus "confirmed" tumor size will be compared between S-MRI and N-MRI groups.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01094626
|Principal Investigator:||Elizabeth Hecht, MD||Columbia University|