Effects of Spontaneous Breathing Activity on Atelectasis Formation During General Anaesthesia (SBAFGA)
Other: Spontaneous Breathing
Other: Pressure Controlled Ventilation
Other: Pressure Support Ventilation
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Subject)
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
|Official Title:||Effects of Spontaneous Breathing Activity on Atelectasis Formation During General Anaesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial|
- Regional ventilation at the end of anaesthesia and at discharge from PACU compared to baseline values obtained before induction [ Time Frame: Before, during and after anesthesia ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Differences in spirometry values, oxygenation in the PACU (measured as SpO2 at room air), breathing effort [ Time Frame: Before, during and after anesthesia ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|Study Start Date:||March 2010|
|Study Completion Date:||October 2010|
|Primary Completion Date:||October 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Patients will be breathing spontaneously during anesthesia
|Other: Spontaneous Breathing|
Pressure controlled ventilation
Patients in the PPV group will be ventilated by pressure control (tidal volume 8-10 ml/kg, frequency 10-14, I:E 1:1, no PEEP, target CO2 4.5 kPa).
|Other: Pressure Controlled Ventilation|
Pressure Support Ventilation
The patients in the PSV group will breathing spontaneously on the ventilator with assistance by inspiratory support pressure. The support pressure will be adjusted to achieve a tidal volume of 8-10 ml/kg.
|Other: Pressure Support Ventilation|
Atelectasis formation is a common phenomenon during general anaesthesia, occurring in almost 90% of patients (Lundquist, Hedenstierna et al. 1995). In patients in supine position, atelectasis of dorsal lung zones is usually accompanied by redistribution of ventilation towards ventral areas (Hedenstierna 2003; Victorino, Borges et al. 2004).The main mechanisms which contribute to the formation of atelectasis are compression (e.g. in obese patients or during laparoscopic surgery), absorption (e.g. when high concentrations of inspired oxygen are used) and reduced surfactant action(Magnusson and Spahn 2003). Atelectasis impairs oxygenation by reducing the functional residual capacity and by causing right-to-left-shunts. Consecutively, hypoxemia after extubation is common in daily practice: 20% of patients in a study experienced desaturations below 92% (Mathes, Conaway et al. 2001), and the risk is even higher in patients with risk-factors such as obesity or thoraco-abdominal procedures (Russell and Graybeal 1993; Xue, Li et al. 1999). Hypoxemic events prolong the stay in PACU, cause more ICU admissions and increase the incidence of cardiac complications (Rosenberg, Rasmussen et al. 1990; Gill, Wright et al. 1992).
Several measures to prevent or treat atelectasis in ventilated patients have been investigated, such as PEEP (Brismar, Hedenstierna et al. 1985; Tokics, Hedenstierna et al. 1987; Neumann, Rothen et al. 1999), recruitment maneuvers (Neumann, Rothen et al. 1999) and spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation (Putensen, Rasanen et al. 1994; Putensen, Mutz et al. 1999). The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is ideally suited for spontaneous breathing during general anaesthesia because of its low resistance. A large survey found that more than half of the routine cases with an LMA are performed under spontaneous ventilation (Verghese and Brimacombe 1996), while positive pressure ventilation is equally acceptable. With regard to the prevention of atelectasis, spontaneous ventilation could be advantageous.
Most works on atelectasis formation during general anaesthesia used CT. Although CT is a gold standard for quantification of lung aeration, it can only provide data on single time points and is not suitable for measurements during routine cases. In recent years, the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has evolved into a versatile tool, which allows detailed insights into ventilation and perfusion conditions of the lung (Bodenstein, David et al. 2009). EIT allows continuous assessment of lung aeration, is non-invasive and can easily be used as a research and monitoring tool during routine cases.
We hypothesize that compared with positive pressure ventilation (PPV), pressure support ventilation (PSV) during general anaesthesia reduces the extent of redistribution as detected by EIT during and after the procedure.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01073917
|University Hospital Carl-Gustav-Carus|
|Dresden, Saxonia, Germany, 01307|