Volar Locked Plating Versus Bridging External Fixation
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01062997|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : February 5, 2010
Last Update Posted : August 9, 2016
A randomized, prospective comparison of volar locked plating versus Hoffman II bridging external fixation supplemented by K-wire fixation in patients with comminuted distal radius fractures, AO/OTA type C2 & C3.
There is no significant difference in using volar plates compared to Hoffman II bridging external fixation supplemented by K-wire fixation in patients with comminuted distal radius fractures, AO/OTA type C2 & C3 as evaluated by a Quick-DASH score at 24 months follow-up.
|Condition or disease|
|Distal Radius Fracture|
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Actual Enrollment :||166 participants|
|Observational Model:||Case Control|
|Official Title:||Volar Locked Plating Versus Bridging External Fixation|
|Study Start Date :||September 2009|
|Primary Completion Date :||December 2015|
|Study Completion Date :||April 2016|
- Quick-DASH [ Time Frame: 2 year follow-up ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01062997
|Akershus University Hospital|
|Sykehusveien 25, Nordbyhagen, Lorenskog, Norway, 1478|