Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Guideline Implementation Study (ABU)
Infection Due to Indwelling Urinary Catheter
|Study Design:||Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
|Official Title:||Guideline Implementation to Decrease Inappropriate Bacteriuria Treatment|
- Number of Cases of ABU That Are Treated Inappropriately With Antibiotics [ Time Frame: Years 1, 2, & 3 ]
- Urine Cultures Ordered [ Time Frame: three years ]Number of urine cultures collected per 1000 catheter-days for each unit
- Number of Cases of CAUTI Inappropriately Under-treated (no Antibiotics Given) [ Time Frame: Years 1, 2, & 3 ]
- Number of Days Antibiotics Are Given to Treat ABU [ Time Frame: one year ]
- Clinicians' Awareness of and Familiarity With the ABU Guidelines. [ Time Frame: one year ]
- Clinicians Acceptance of and Outcome Expectancy From Following the ABU Guidelines [ Time Frame: one year ]
- Number of Catheter-days of Use Per 1000 Patient Bed Days on Each Unit [ Time Frame: One year ]
- Patient Level Analysis of Inappropriate Antibiotic Use [ Time Frame: three years ]We looked at the percentage of cases of ASB (asymptomatic bacteriuria) that were inappropriately over-treated with antibiotics, and we also looked at the percentage of cases of CAUTI (catheter-associated UTI) that were not treated with antibiotics (under-treated).
|Study Start Date:||July 2011|
|Study Completion Date:||June 2013|
|Primary Completion Date:||June 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Experimental: Arm 1
Baseline surveillance for the clinical outcomes will begin in year 1 at the intervention site and continue for all 3 years of the project. Guideline distribution will begin in year 2 and continue throughout the project. Audit-feedback will occur during year 2 of the study at the intervention site. Feedback will be delivered to individual health care providers at the intervention site during year 2.Unit-level audit feedback will be delivered at the intervention site during years 2 and 3 of the study. Provider surveys of knowledge and attitudes concerning the ABU guidelines will be administered at the intervention site in years 2 and 3 of the project.
Applied as a post-prescription antimicrobial review based on established guidelines.
No Intervention: Arm 2
At the control site, baseline surveillance for the clinical outcomes will begin in year 1 at the and continue for all 3 years of the project. Guideline distribution will begin in year 2 and continue throughout the project. Audit-feedback will not occur at the control site. Provider surveys of knowledge and attitudes concerning the ABU guidelines will be administered at the control site in year 3 of the project.
Anticipated Impacts on Veterans' Healthcare: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the single most common hospital-acquired infection. However, the majority of cases of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) are really asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU). ABU is not a clinically significant condition, and treatment is unlikely to confer benefit. Overtreatment of ABU is a quality, safety, and cost issue, particularly as unnecessary antibiotics lead to emergence of resistant flora. Our proposal to bring clinical practice in line with published guidelines has significant potential to decrease CAUTI and associated inappropriate antibiotic use in VA hospitals. Our study will also provide information about how to maximize effectiveness of audit-feedback to achieve guideline adherence in the inpatient VA setting.
Project Background/Rationale: Evidence-based guidelines recommend that providers neither screen for nor treat ABU in most catheterized patients. However, a significant gap between these guidelines and clinical practice has been documented at our VA hospital and throughout the world. Since many VA patients in both acute care settings and sub-acute care settings, such as intermediate and long-term care, have a legitimate need for a urinary catheter, the issue of overtreatment of catheter-associated ABU is an active problem for the VA.
Project Objectives: We hypothesize that implementing the existing evidence-based guidelines about non-treatment of ABU will dramatically reduce the unnecessary use of antibiotics to treat ABU and the incidence of incorrectly diagnosed CAUTI. Our first objective is to improve quality of care concerning ABU in terms of specific clinical outcomes (inappropriate screening for and treatment of ABU) through implementation of an audit-feedback strategy. We also hypothesize that successful implementation of an audit-feedback strategy will result in measurable changes in clinicians' knowledge and attitudes concerning ABU practice guidelines. Our second objective is to assess through surveys the effect of the implementation on clinicians' guideline awareness, familiarity, acceptance, and outcome expectancy.
Project Methods: Our guidelines implementation strategy will employ audit-feedback, applied as a post-prescription antimicrobial review based on established guidelines. The study population for the clinical outcomes is all inpatients on certain wards at the intervention site (Houston VA) and the control site (San Antonio VA). Our study population for the audit-feedback intervention and surveys is the health care providers on these wards. We propose a 3-year study. During the first year we will observe the baseline incidence of inappropriate screening for and treatment of ABU at both sites. Blinded monitoring of clinical outcomes will continue during the next 2 years of the study. During the second year, we will distribute the guidelines at both sites. Clinicians at the intervention site will receive individualized feedback, either by telephone or in person, about whether their management of bacteriuria was guideline-compliant. Unit-level feedback will also be provided. During the third year, individualized feedback will cease, but unit-level feedback will continue as this constitutes a sustainable intervention. Clinicians will complete pre/post surveys of awareness, familiarity, acceptance, and outcome expectancy at the intervention site in year 2 and at both sites in year 3. Differences in outcomes between the individualized intervention in year 2 and the group-level intervention in year 3 will help to determine the necessary intensity of intervention for dissemination and implementation in other VA facilities.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01052545
|United States, Texas|
|Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX|
|Houston, Texas, United States, 77030|
|Principal Investigator:||Barbara Trautner, MD||Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX|