This site became the new on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu
Give us feedback

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Cemented Versus Cementless Tibial Prosthesis Study (TKA)

The recruitment status of this study is unknown. The completion date has passed and the status has not been verified in more than two years.
Verified January 2010 by Washington University School of Medicine.
Recruitment status was:  Active, not recruiting
Wright Medical Technology
Information provided by:
Washington University School of Medicine Identifier:
First received: January 4, 2010
Last updated: January 5, 2010
Last verified: January 2010
The primary purpose of TKA Randomized Clinical Trial- Cemented versus Cementless Tibial Prosthesis Study will determine whether there is a significant difference in patient-reported and measured clinical outcomes (e.g. pain, function, length of recovery, and patient satisfaction) between subjects treated with a cementless tibial prosthesis (the cementless group) and those treated with cemented tibial prosthesis (the cement group) over the first two postoperative years. Radiographs will be assessed before surgery and at established post-operative intervals to determine if there are any significant differences between patients in the two groups and to assess the influence of component fixation on radiographic stability over time. Complication and revision rates will also be assessed for comparison.

Condition Intervention Phase
Osteoarthritis Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis Rheumatoid Arthritis Procedure: Cemented Tibia Procedure: Cementless Tibia Phase 2 Phase 3

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Total Knee Arthroplasty Randomized Clinical Trial- Cemented vs. Cementless Tibial Prosthesis Study

Resource links provided by NLM:

Further study details as provided by Washington University School of Medicine:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • To use clinical outcome measures to assess for differences in patient function, quality of life and satisfaction between patients who have tibial component placement with either a cemented or a cementless technique [ Time Frame: 2014 ]

Estimated Enrollment: 250
Study Start Date: December 2009
Estimated Study Completion Date: December 2014
Estimated Primary Completion Date: September 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Active Comparator: Cemented Tibia
Assessing the clinical outcomes of the different type of fixation
Procedure: Cemented Tibia
Total knee arthroplasty with cemented or cemented tibia, and post operative clinical outcome tracking
Active Comparator: Cementless Tibia
Assessing the clinical outcomes of the different type of fixation
Procedure: Cementless Tibia
Assessing the clinical outcomes of the different type of fixation


Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 70 Years   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BMI less than <35
  • Normal neurological function
  • Primary total knee arthroplasty (Pre operative Medial Knee Patient)
  • Patient age ≤ 70 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision surgery
  • History of joint sepsis
  • Recent systemic corticosteroids (< 2 months prior to procedure)
  • Primary or secondary carcinoma in the last five years
  • Post operative renal transplant
  • Psychosocial disorders limiting rehabilitation
  • Previous intraarticular knee fracture
  • Over 20° valgus or varus deformity
  • Extension loss over 20°
  • Unsuitable for cruciate- substituting arthroplasty
  • Unsuitable for cementless fixation of the tibial component
  • Need for augmentation wedges or bone graft
  • Previous proximal tibial osteotomy
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its identifier: NCT01041937

United States, Missouri
Washington University School of Medicine
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
Sponsors and Collaborators
Washington University School of Medicine
Wright Medical Technology
Principal Investigator: John Clohisy, MD Washington University School of Medicine
  More Information

Responsible Party: John C. Clohisy, Washington University Identifier: NCT01041937     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: Clohisy TKA trial
Study First Received: January 4, 2010
Last Updated: January 5, 2010

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Joint Diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Rheumatic Diseases
Connective Tissue Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
Immune System Diseases processed this record on September 19, 2017