Multi-Site Evaluation of Progressive Tinnitus Management
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01015781|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : November 18, 2009
Results First Posted : December 19, 2014
Last Update Posted : December 19, 2014
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Tinnitus||Procedure: Progressive Tinnitus Management Procedure: Wait List Control||Not Applicable|
Objectives. We completed a single-site pilot project to develop and evaluate Progressive Tinnitus Management (PTM). PTM takes into account the fact that most Veterans who complain of tinnitus do not require extensive intervention. The method thus is "progressive" in that a hierarchical approach is used to provide clinical services only to the degree needed by individual patients. Preliminary analyses of our pilot data provide evidence that PTM is an effective and efficient means of providing tinnitus management services to Veterans. Importantly, The Veterans Affairs (VA) Audiology and Speech Pathology Program Office has identified PTM as a standardized method of tinnitus management for use at all VA medical centers. It is essential to more definitively evaluate PTM for routine application at VA medical centers. Accordingly, the specific aim of this study was to conduct a randomized clinical trial at multiple VA medical centers to evaluate the effectiveness and clinical utility of PTM as compared to Wait List Control.
Plan. The 3-year study was based at the VA National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), and PTM was implemented and evaluated in a randomized clinical trial at the Memphis VA Medical Center and at the VA Connecticut Healthcare System (West Haven). During months 0-6: (a) All clinical materials for conducting PTM were modified (especially with the addition of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy - CBT); (b) training materials were developed (the web-based PTM training program for VA audiologists was updated; PTM training will be developed for VA psychologists); (c) by random selection, five audiologists (two in Memphis, three in West Haven) were identified to conduct PTM and five (two in Memphis, three in West Haven) were identified to conduct usual care; (d) the five PTM audiologists (the West Haven study psychologist developed the training). By month 7, the randomized clinical trial was implemented at the two VA sites and continued through year 3.
Methods. Prior to conducting the clinical trial, PTM was modified to incorporate critical components of CBT at all levels of intervention so as to address the psychological effects of tinnitus. Qualifying Veteran subjects (n=150 at each site) were randomized into either PTM or Wait List Control. Self-perceived tinnitus handicap was evaluated pre- and post-intervention for each subject using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. The five audiologists and two psychologists who participate in this study were interviewed to determine their level of satisfaction with the PTM protocol to which they are assigned. Evaluation of the program will determine its efficacy, and will identify areas of needed improvement.
Relevance to VA's Mission. Although tinnitus is the second most common service-connected disability, most VA medical centers do not provide comprehensive clinical services for Veterans suffering from tinnitus. This study extends our current work, which has focused on the development of a comprehensive tinnitus management protocol that can be implemented efficiently in VA hospitals. Further development of PTM has the potential of providing needed tinnitus services to Veterans across the country for a relatively small cost and with minimal impact on individual VA hospitals.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||300 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Multi-Site Evaluation of Progressive Tinnitus Management|
|Study Start Date :||December 2010|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||December 2013|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||December 2013|
Experimental: Arm 1
Progressive Tinnitus Management
Procedure: Progressive Tinnitus Management
The program follows a five-level "progressive intervention" model that addresses the various needs of tinnitus patients in a systematic and hierarchical manner-from initial contact with a VA provider through long-term treatment. The five levels of progressive intervention are: 1) Triage; 2) Audiologic Evaluation; 3) Group Education; 4) Interdisciplinary Evaluation; 5) Individualized Support
Other Name: PTM
Wait List Control
Procedure: Wait List Control
VA audiologists typically (a) perform an audiologic evaluation; (b) fit hearing aids if necessary; and (c) provide basic information about tinnitus in the form of one-time, one-on-one informational counseling and/or a tinnitus handout. We therefore will provide these procedures for subjects who are randomized to receive usual care. Usual care subjects also can be referred for other clinical services as deemed appropriate.
- Tinnitus Functional Index Change Score [ Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months (from Baseline) ]
The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) is a tinnitus outcome measure that has been validated for "responsiveness" (Meikle et al., 2012). Prior to the TFI, no tinnitus questionnaire had been specifically designed and tested to maximize responsiveness to treatment-related change.
Completion of the 25-item TFI results in an index score that can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater problems associated with tinnitus. The following is a general guide to facilitate interpretation of TFI scores:
- <25 = relatively mild tinnitus (little or no need for intervention)
- 25-50 = significant problems with tinnitus (possible need for intervention) •>50 = tinnitus severe enough to qualify for more aggressive intervention Data from the TFI development study (Meikle et al., 2012) suggest that a reduction in the TFI score of at least 13 points would indicate a clinical improvement that a patient would consider important or meaningful.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01015781
|United States, Connecticut|
|VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven)|
|West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516|
|United States, Oregon|
|VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR|
|Portland, Oregon, United States, 97201|
|United States, Tennessee|
|VA Medical Center, Memphis|
|Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38104|
|Principal Investigator:||James A Henry, PhD||VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR|