Safety Study of External Counterpulsation as a Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke (CUFFS)
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00983749|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 24, 2009
Results First Posted : June 28, 2016
Last Update Posted : June 28, 2016
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Stroke||Device: Full-pressure ECP Device: Sham-pressure ECP||Phase 1|
A stroke is usually caused by a blockage of one of the arteries that carries blood to the brain. Sometimes with a stroke, there may be a small amount of blood flow that manages to get through or around the blockage, and it may be possible that the amount of damage from a stroke may be reduced by increasing this blood flow. External counterpulsation (ECP) is a procedure in which a machine uses electrical signals from the heart that are detectable on the surface of the body in order to time the inflation of cuffs (similar to a blood pressure cuff) that are wrapped around a patient's legs (calves, thighs and buttocks). Using a reading of the electrical activity from the patient's heart (an electrocardiogram, or ECG, monitor), the machine inflates the cuffs with air at just the right time during each heart beat, during diastole, in order to change the blood pressure in a way that has been shown to increase blood flow to the kidneys, skin, eyes, heart, and brain.
In this study, patients presenting within the first 48 hours of an acute ischemic stroke (i.e., a blockage of one of the arteries supplying a part of the brain) will be randomly assigned to either of (1) a 1-hour treatment of external counterpulsation (ECP) applied at a pressure that is typically therapeutic, or (2) a 1-hour treatment of ECP at a minimal pressure in a control group. ECP-induced changes in brain artery flow velocity will be assessed with an ultrasound prior to and then during ECP in each group, and an optimal pressure that results in an augmentation of flow velocity will be determined. A neurological exam will be performed prior to, during, and after ECP in each group, in order to assess any changes in stroke symptoms related to ECP. Patients will be followed to 30 days. The main goal of this trial is to evaluate if ECP is safe and feasible to use as a treatment for stroke. In addition, the trial will enable an assessment of whether or not ECP increases blood flow to the brain or affects the neurological symptoms of a patient with a stroke.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||23 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Official Title:||A Randomized, Controlled Phase 1 Study of External Counterpulsation as a Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke|
|Study Start Date :||December 2009|
|Primary Completion Date :||February 2013|
|Study Completion Date :||July 2013|
Experimental: Full-pressure ECP
Patients in the "Full-pressure ECP" arm receive a 1-hour treatment of ECP at full pressure, which will be applied in a tiered, dose-escalating manner up to 300mmHg, while assessments are made.
Device: Full-pressure ECP
A one-hour treatment of ECP at full pressure, which will be applied in a tiered, dose-escalating manner, starting at 200mmHg and increasing up to 300mmHg based on assessments made.
Other Name: External counterpulsation
Sham Comparator: Sham-pressure ECP
A 1-hour treatment of ECP at an inactive pressure (75mmHg)
Device: Sham-pressure ECP
A one-hour treatment of ECP at an inactive pressure, which will be applied at 75mmHg and kept there for the hour while assessments are made.
Other Name: External counterpulsation
- Feasibility and Tolerability of External Counterpulsation [ Time Frame: During one hour of treatment ]The first primary outcome measure was tolerability and feasibility. Tolerance was defined as the absence of any indications to stop the procedure or reduce the pressure to a non-therapeutic level. Feasibility was defined in the full-pressure group as the sustained (at least 30 minutes) tolerance of any pressure capable of causing a 15% augmentation of MFV in 90% of subjects, and defined in the sham-pressure group as the sustained tolerance of the sham pressure in all subjects.
- Safety (Including Endpoints Such an Increase NIHSS During or Immediately After ECP, and Acute Hemorrhage on Repeating Imaging, Serious Adverse Events Related to ECP, Mortality) [ Time Frame: 30 days ]Safety was evaluated by the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) or acute neurological deterioration in relation to the study device and/or procedures at 30 days, the incidence of acute symptomatic hemorrhage on repeat imaging at 24 hours, the incidence of all adverse events (AEs) in the first 48 hours, and mortality at 30 days. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a stroke severity scale, based on examination, that goes from 0 (no deficit) to a maximum of 42. Acute neurological deterioration - which was captured as a serious adverse event - was defined as a ≥4-point increase on the NIHSS, or a ≥2-point decline in level of consciousness item 1a on the NIHSS, or a new neurological deficit, or clinically significant worsening of motor function lasting more than 8 hours and attributable to a neurological entity. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was defined as new hemorrhage on CT that was associated with acute neurological deterioration.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00983749
|United States, Alabama|
|University of Alabama Hospital|
|Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35249|
|United States, California|
|UCLA Medical Center|
|Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095|
|UCSD Medical Center|
|San Diego, California, United States, 92103|
|Principal Investigator:||Kama Z Guluma, M.D.||University of California, San Diego|