Validation of a Novel Sham Cervical Spinal Manipulation Procedure

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT00978094
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 16, 2009
Last Update Posted : November 17, 2010
Information provided by:
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

Brief Summary:

Primary hypotheses:

Ho1: In chronic neck pain patients, randomly treated with either a "sham" or "real" cervical manipulation procedure, the probability of perceiving a Real Manipulation Procedure is equal to the probability of obtaining a Real Manipulation Procedure, AND, Ho2: Spinal tenderness will remain unchanged following the treatment procedure for both groups.

Secondary (null) hypotheses:

  1. Neck pain, cervical ranges of motion and paraspinal EMG responses to pressure pain will remain unchanged in both groups;
  2. there will be no differences between groups with respect to 2a) neck joint cavitations and 2b) forces across the cervical spine measured during the manoeuvres.

Condition or disease
Chronic Neck Pain

Detailed Description:
  1. Develop a randomized controlled clinical trial design to optimize the testing of the effects of a sham vs real cervical manipulation.
  2. Use novel modifications of both a sham a real manipulation to create "procedures" designed to optimize group equivalence in the RCT design. Then, evaluate the accuracy of 'patient post-treatment perception of treatment type' versus actual administered treatment (primary outcome #1).
  3. Quantitatively evaluate group differences in local soft-tissue tenderness by algometry (primary outcome #2), as well as changes in self-reported neck pain, ranges of motion, myoelectric responses in selected neck muscles and forces imparted during the procedures.
  4. Evaluate the occurrence of neck joint cavitation during the manoeuvres comprising these procedures.

Study Type : Observational
Estimated Enrollment : 80 participants
Official Title: Validation of a Novel Sham Cervical Spinal Manipulation Procedure.
Study Start Date : February 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date : October 2010
Actual Study Completion Date : October 2010

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

U.S. FDA Resources

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. The perception by subjects as to whether they received a real treatment (YES/NO) [ Time Frame: 10 mins ]
  2. Change scores of the pressure algometry [ Time Frame: 10 mins ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Current Neck Pain, Ranges of Motion, MES Response will be analysed by comparing baseline, 15-and 120-minute score [ Time Frame: approximately 1 hours + ]

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Ages Eligible for Study:   21 Years to 55 Years   (Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Participants in this study will be consenting adults, 21-55 years of age, male or female who have chronic mechanical neck pain (NP) rated as between 30 and 65 on an NRS-101 scale [74]. For the purposes of this study NP is defined as;

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 21-55 years old with chronic neck pain, Males/Females
  • Between 30-60 NRS 101 Scale
  • ≥ 4 weeks mechanical neck pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cervical Spine Surgery
  • Medically uncontrolled High Blood Pressure
  • Past History of Stroke
  • Upper Respiratory Infection within 4 weeks
  • Current Symptoms of Dizziness
  • Tinnitus, Blurred Vision, Vertigo, Sensory Motor Disturbance
  • Current use of anticoagulant therapy
  • Connective Tissue Disorder
  • Primary Fibromyalgia or myofascial pain
  • Metabolic/Neoplastic Bone Disease

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its identifier (NCT number): NCT00978094

Canada, Ontario
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
Sponsors and Collaborators
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
Principal Investigator: Howard Vernon, BA, DC, PhD, FCCS, FCCRS CMCC

Responsible Party: Howard Vernon, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College Identifier: NCT00978094     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 072155
1R21AT004396-01A1 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract )
First Posted: September 16, 2009    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: November 17, 2010
Last Verified: November 2010

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Neck Pain
Neurologic Manifestations
Nervous System Diseases
Signs and Symptoms