We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Double-Lumen Tube With or Without a Carinal Hook

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00969683
First Posted: September 1, 2009
Last Update Posted: September 23, 2016
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Hopital Foch
  Purpose

Most teams use a left double-lumen tube. The double-lumen tube is available with or without a carinal hook. The hook is supposed to facilitate the positioning of the tube and avoid the mobilization of the tube during surgery. The use of double-lumen tubes with a hook is large in Europe and quite unknown in US. The literature is poor, containing only few case reports.

The purpose of this research is to compare the two types of left double-lumen tube.


Condition Intervention
Anesthesia Device: Tracheal intubation

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Comparison Between Left Double-lumen Tube With or Without a Carinal Hook During Lung Surgery

Further study details as provided by Hopital Foch:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • time required to initially position the assigned tube [ Time Frame: end of anesthesia ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • degree of lung collapse [ Time Frame: end of anesthesia ]
  • number of intraoperatively FOB examinations [ Time Frame: end of anesthesia ]
  • Glottic or tracheo-bronchial lesion [ Time Frame: end of hospitalisation ]
  • Sore throat or hoarse voice [ Time Frame: end of hospitalisation ]

Enrollment: 184
Study Start Date: August 2009
Study Completion Date: May 2013
Primary Completion Date: December 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Active Comparator: Double lumen tube without a hook
Broncho-Cath™, Mallinckrodt France, Parc d'Affaires Technopolis, 3 avenue du Canada, Bât Sigma, Les Ulis, 91975 Courtaboeuf Cedex
Device: Tracheal intubation
Tracheal intubation using a Double lumen tube without a hook
Experimental: Double lumen tube with a hook
Broncho-Cath™, Mallinckrodt France, Parc d'Affaires Technopolis, 3 avenue du Canada, Bât Sigma, Les Ulis, 91975 Courtaboeuf Cedex
Device: Tracheal intubation
Tracheal intubation with a Double lumen tube with a hook

  Eligibility

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients scheduled for lung surgery requiring one-lung ventilation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • ASA class 4
  • prevision of difficult intubation or of pulmonary aspiration
  Contacts and Locations
Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00969683


Locations
France
Service d'Anesthésie, Hôpital Foch
Suresnes, France, 92150
Sponsors and Collaborators
Hopital Foch
Investigators
Study Chair: Marc Fischler, MD Hôpital Foch
  More Information

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Responsible Party: Hopital Foch
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00969683     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 2009/21
First Submitted: August 28, 2009
First Posted: September 1, 2009
Last Update Posted: September 23, 2016
Last Verified: September 2016