Evaluation of Cipro Inhale in Patients With Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00930982 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : July 2, 2009
Results First Posted : January 30, 2012
Last Update Posted : December 12, 2014
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Bronchiectasis | Drug: Ciprofloxacin (Cipro, BAYQ3939) Drug: Placebo | Phase 2 |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 124 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin Inhale Compared to Placebo in Patients With Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis |
Study Start Date : | June 2009 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | September 2010 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | September 2010 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Ciprofloxacin Inhale (BAYQ3939)
32.5 mg ciprofloxacin hydrated corresponding to 50 mg Ciprofloxacin PulmoSphere Inhalation Powder twice daily
|
Drug: Ciprofloxacin (Cipro, BAYQ3939)
Inhalation of 32,5mg Ciprofloxacin inhaled twice a day |
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Inhalation of matching placebo twice a day
|
Drug: Placebo
Inhalation of matching placebo twice a day |
- Change From Baseline in Total Bacterial Load in the Sputum at End of Treatment (Day 29). [ Time Frame: Baseline and 29 days ]Total bacterial load was determined in sputum collected before the inhalation of study drug. Sputum samples were either provided by the participant during the respective study visit, or participants had to bring a sputum sample that had been produced within the 4 hours prior to the visit. Induced sputum samples could be collected if the participant was unable to produce a spontaneously expectorated sputum sample of > 2 mL. Imputation method: last observation carried forward (LOCF). CFU: colony forming units, log10: decadic logarithm
- Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ]Pulmonary function testing (spirometry) was conducted in accordance with American Thoracic Society standards. FEV1 was defined as the maximal volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration from a position of full inspiration, expressed in liters at body temperature and ambient pressure saturated with water vapor (BTPS). Imputation method: last observation carried forward (LOCF).
- Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ]Pulmonary function testing (spirometry) was conducted in accordance with American Thoracic Society standards. FVC was defined as the maximal volume of air exhaled with maximally forced effort from a maximal inspiration, i.e. vital capacity performed with a maximally forced expiratory effort expressed in liters at BTPS. Imputation method: last observation carried forward (LOCF).
- Time to Exacerbation With Antibiotic Intervention [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ]Acute exacerbation was defined according to the joint American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria. For detailed information with regard to this definition of acute exacerbation, please refer to the detailed description in the protocol section. The time to an acute exacerbation with antibiotic intervention was determined.
- Effect of Ciprofloxacin Inhale Treatment on Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as Measured by the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Total Score [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ]Participants completed the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). They were assured that all data would be treated confidentially and that the answers would not have any influence on study drug treatment. Participants completed the questionnaires on their own in a quiet area, without discussing them with study staff or accompanying persons (e.g. friends or relatives) and before being seen by the clinician. The score ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being the worst possible score.
- Effect of Ciprofloxacin Inhale Treatment on Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as Measured by Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire - Self Administered Standardized (CRQ-SAS) [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ]Participants completed the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire - Self Administered Standardized (CRQ-SAS). They were assured that all data would be treated confidentially and that the answers would not have any influence on study drug treatment. Participants completed the questionnaires on their own in a quiet area, without discussing them with study staff or accompanying persons (e.g. friends or relatives) and before being seen by the clinician. The score ranges between 1 and 7, 1 being the worst possible score.
- Change From Baseline in High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to Day 42 ]High sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was determined from safety blood samples. Missing or invalid values were replaced with the last valid value available.
- Change From Baseline in Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to Day 42 ]Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was determined from safety blood samples. Missing or invalid values were replaced with the last valid value available.
- 24-hour Sputum Volume [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ]Participants were asked to start 24-hour sputum collection samples 24 hours before coming for the respective study visit. The volume of the completed sample was determined.
- 24-hour Sputum Color (Percentage of Participants With Non-clear Sputum) [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ]Participants were asked to start 24-hour sputum collection samples 24 hours before coming for the respective study visit. Sputum color was assessed as either 'clear', or as 'yellow', 'green' or 'rust', or an assessment of 'no sputum' was made.
- Microbiological Response of Cipro Inhale Per Participant [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ]Microbiological response was defined as reduction in bacterial load or eradication (measured as the percentage of participants with positive culture). Missing values were not imputed.
- Microbiological Response of Cipro Inhale Per Pathogen [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ]Microbiological response was defined as reduction in bacterial load or eradication (measured as the number of participants with positive culture). Missing values were not imputed. Pathogens analyzed: Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Proteus mirabilis, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, mucoid, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, non mucoid, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxydans, Moraxella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae
- Emergence of New Potential Respiratory Pathogens [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ]The emergence of new potential respiratory pathogens was evaluated using microbiological analysis. Evaluated was the cumulative number of participants with first appearance of new potential respiratory antigens at each time point. In some cases, participants attended the end of study visit later than Day 84 (up to Day 88).
- Emergence of Resistance Among Baseline Pathogens [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ]The emergence of resistance (at least two-fold increase of Minimal inhibitory concentration, MIC, vs. baseline values) probably or possibly related to study medication among baseline pathogens was evaluated using microbiological analysis.
- Change From Baseline in Total Bacterial Load in the Sputum [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ]Total bacterial load was determined in sputum collected before the inhalation of study drug. Sputum samples were either provided by the participant during the respective study visit, or participants had to bring a sputum sample that had been produced within the 4 hours prior to the visit. Induced sputum samples could be collected if the participant was unable to produce a spontaneously expectorated sputum sample of > 2 mL on Day 8. Imputation method: last observation carried forward (LOCF). CFU: colony forming units, log10: decadic logarithm

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a proven and documented diagnosis of non-cystic fibrosis idiopathic or post pneumonic bronchiectasis
- Stable pulmonary status and stable regimen of standard treatment at least for the past 30 days
Exclusion Criteria:
- Forced Expiratory Volume 1 < 35% or > 80%
- Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis
- Immunodeficiency disease requiring immunoglobulin replacement
- Inflammatory bowel disease

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00930982
United States, Arkansas | |
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205 | |
United States, California | |
La Jolla, California, United States, 92037 | |
United States, Colorado | |
Denver, Colorado, United States, 80206 | |
United States, Connecticut | |
Farmington, Connecticut, United States, 06030 | |
United States, District of Columbia | |
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007-2197 | |
United States, Florida | |
Naples, Florida, United States, 34109-0446 | |
United States, Indiana | |
Michigan City, Indiana, United States, 46360 | |
United States, New York | |
Mineola, New York, United States, 11501 | |
United States, Texas | |
Houston, Texas, United States, 77204 | |
Tyler, Texas, United States, 75708-3154 | |
United States, Utah | |
Payson, Utah, United States, 84651 | |
Australia, New South Wales | |
Concord, New South Wales, Australia, 2139 | |
Australia, Queensland | |
South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4101 | |
Woollongabba, Queensland, Australia, 4102 | |
Australia, South Australia | |
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000 | |
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5065 | |
Australia, Victoria | |
Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, 3084 | |
Prahran, Victoria, Australia, 3181 | |
Australia, Western Australia | |
Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia, 6009 | |
Germany | |
Löwenstein, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 74245 | |
Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg, Germany, 15562 | |
Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany, 60596 | |
Gelnhausen, Hessen, Germany, 63571 | |
Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany, 30167 | |
Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany, 30625 | |
Witten, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 58452 | |
Koblenz, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany, 56068 | |
Mainz, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany, 55131 | |
Geesthacht, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 21502 | |
Großhansdorf, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 22927 | |
Bad Berka, Thüringen, Germany, 99437 | |
Berlin, Germany, 10961 | |
Berlin, Germany, 12203 | |
Berlin, Germany, 13507 | |
Berlin, Germany, 14059 | |
Spain | |
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain, 15706 | |
Palma de Mallorca, Illes Baleares, Spain, 07010 | |
Badajoz, Spain, 06080 | |
Barcelona, Spain, 08036 | |
Sweden | |
Uppsala, Sweden, 751 85 | |
United Kingdom | |
Bristol, Avon, United Kingdom, BS2 8HW | |
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, CB3 8RE | |
Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom, L9 7JU | |
Belfast, North Ireland, United Kingdom, BT12 7AB | |
Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom, NE7 7DN | |
Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH16 4SA | |
Norwich, United Kingdom, NR4 7UY |
Study Director: | Bayer Study Director | Bayer |
Publications of Results:
Responsible Party: | Bayer |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00930982 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
12965 2009-009869-34 ( EudraCT Number ) |
First Posted: | July 2, 2009 Key Record Dates |
Results First Posted: | January 30, 2012 |
Last Update Posted: | December 12, 2014 |
Last Verified: | November 2014 |
Ciprofloxacin Airway infection Bronchiectasis |
Bronchiectasis Bronchial Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Ciprofloxacin Anti-Bacterial Agents Anti-Infective Agents Topoisomerase II Inhibitors |
Topoisomerase Inhibitors Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Antineoplastic Agents Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2 Inhibitors Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors |