Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Joint Instability in Patients With Severe Pelvic Girdle Pain After Pregnancy and Trauma
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00900601|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : May 13, 2009
Results First Posted : May 28, 2018
Last Update Posted : May 28, 2018
Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) related to pregnancy is a common reason to sick leave during pregnancy. Low back pain and PGP affects about 50% of women during pregnancy. Most of the women recover, however about 10% of the women still have complaints after birth. Most patients have positive effect from conservative treatment, but unfortunately some do still have much pain despite intensive conservative rehabilitation. Surgery has been tried on these women with various results. Surgical treatment is controversial and there is a lack of documentation. The investigators will operate 20 patients with arthrodesis to the sacroiliac joint and symphysis. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) will be used to evaluate the joint movement in different part of the process.
Hypothesis: Severe pelvic girdle pain is caused by pelvic joint instability in some cases and surgically fixation of the affected joints can help these women to get back to a normal life.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Pelvic Joint Instability Pelvic Pain||Procedure: Arthrodesis to the sacroiliac joint and symphysis||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||9 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Joint Instability in Patients With Severe Pelvic Girdle Pain After Pregnancy and Trauma - A Study to Measure Effect of Surgery, Analysis of Clinical Tests and Detection of Sacroiliac Instability Using RSA.|
|Study Start Date :||January 2007|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||June 2011|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||June 2011|
Experimental: Sacroilliac fusion
Pastient are treated with sacroiliac joint arthrodesis to the sacroiliac joint and symphysis
Procedure: Arthrodesis to the sacroiliac joint and symphysis
Standard surgical procedures will be used. When the patient has isolated pain in the symphysis isolated fixation will be performed. A 2x2 cm large bone block will be removed and replaced with spongy bone. For fixation the Matta-plate will be applied.
To the sacroiliac joint we use an anterior approach. A 2x1,5 cm large bone block will be removed and replaced with spongy bone from the iliac crest. For joint fixation we either use 2 plates or sacroiliac screws. The same procedure will be used on the other side in the cases with bilateral symptoms. Only one side will be operated at a time. After one year it will be decided if it's necessary to perform contralateral surgery.
- Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) [ Time Frame: 12 months ]Oswestry Disability Index is a 10 item questionnaire comprises 10 questions about physical function. Each item has a 0-5 scale and the raw score is multiplied by 2 and the sum is the total score. Zero represents excellent physical function and 100 is more or less bedridden. This is the most used outcome measure in low back pain studies.
- Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0 to 10 [ Time Frame: 12 months ]Visual Analogue Scale is a 0 -10 scale. Zero is no pain and 10 is the worst pain you can imagine. In this study the patients were asked to report the morgning and evening pain by this scale.
- Healing Measured by CT [ Time Frame: 12 months ]Number of participants with healing as measured by CT data. The outcome was radiological healing vs no signs of radiological healing. In order to be classified as healed the CT scans had to show Clear signs of bone bridging across the sacroiliac joint.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00900601
|Oslo university hospital - Ulllevaal|
|Oslo, Norway, 0407|
|Principal Investigator:||Thomas J Kibsgaard, PhD student||Oslo university hosptal - Ullevaal|