Electrical Stimulation for Recovery of Hand Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00891319 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : May 1, 2009
Results First Posted : November 6, 2017
Last Update Posted : November 6, 2017
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Stroke Hemiparesis Hemiplegia | Device: Electrical stimulator | Not Applicable |
Hemiparesis of the upper limb is one of the most serious and most common impairments resulting from stroke. Approximately 75% of the over 750,000 strokes that occur annually in the United States cause some degree of upper extremity paralysis. Approximately 65% of stroke survivors still cannot use their affected hand to assist with activities of daily living 6 months after their stroke. The impact of upper extremity impairments on disability and health is great, yet there are relatively few rehabilitation interventions designed to restore function to the impaired upper limb. Therefore, our long-term objective is to develop upper extremity rehabilitation therapies that are effective at restoring arm and hand function, that are applicable across a wide range of impairment severity, and that are readily implemented in the present healthcare environment.
The purpose of this study is to estimate the efficacy of Contralataterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation (CCFES) in reducing upper extremity impairment and activity limitation in chronic upper extremity hemiplegia. CCFES is a rehabilitation intervention in which neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is applied to the finger and thumb extensor muscles of the paretic upper limb to open the hand. The stroke survivor controls the stimulation intensity, and consequent degree of hand opening, by modulating the degree of opening of the contralateral unimpaired hand, which is detected by an instrumented glove. Thus, volitional opening of the unaffected hand produces stimulated opening of the affected hand. The stimulation paradigm is used to assist the stroke survivor in practicing functional tasks with their affected hand. We will conduct a randomized controlled trial in which chronic stroke survivors (>6 months post-stroke) will be randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of CCFES or cyclic NMES, an intervention that provides electrical stimulation of the hand extensors, but with preprogrammed timing and intensity. Randomization will be stratified on two levels of baseline hand impairment defined by the degree of voluntary finger extension present. Assessments of upper extremity impairment and activity limitation will be made every 3 weeks during the treatment period and every 2 months during a 6-month follow-up period.
This study is the first randomized controlled trial of CCFES in chronic upper extremity hemiplegia. Ultimately, the information learned in this study will serve to accelerate the development of treatments for reducing post-stroke disability.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 80 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Single (Outcomes Assessor) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Contralaterally Controlled FES for Chronic Arm/Hand Hemiplegia: Single-Site RCT |
Study Start Date : | January 2009 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | May 2015 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | May 2015 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: CCFES
CCFES - Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation
|
Device: Electrical stimulator
• 12-week intervention
|
Active Comparator: cNMES
cNMES - Cyclic NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation
|
Device: Electrical stimulator
• 12-week intervention
|
- Change in Box and Block Test Score at 6 Mo Post-Treatment [ Time Frame: 2 timepoints: Prior to treatment, and 6 months after completion of treatment. ]
The Box and Blocks test counts how many times the participant can pick up 1 block at t time, move it over a partition, and release it in a target area within 60 seconds.
The minimum score is 0. There is no maximum score. The average score of healthy individuals within the age range of this study ranges from 70 to 79.
Higher scores are considered to be a better outcome. For each individual, the score prior to treatment was subtracted from the score at 6 months after completion of treatment. Then for each treatment group, these change scores were averaged.
- Change in Arm Motor Abilities Test Score at 6-Month Post-Treatment [ Time Frame: 2 timepoints: Prior to treatment, and 6 months after completion of treatment. ]
The Arm Motor Abilities Test assesses the participant's ability to execute specific upper limb tasks and does not allow for compensation with the unimpaired side. The test consists of 9 compound tasks composed of 1 to 3 component tasks, each of which is rated on a 0 - 5 ordinal scale: 0, no attempt to use affected limb; 1, attempt to use affected limb but it does not participate functionally; 2, affected limb is used only as a helper or stabilizer; 3, affected limb is used slowly or within synergy patterns; 4, almost normal use of affected limb; 5, normal use. The final score is the average of all component task scores across all 9 compound tasks.
The minimum score is 0; maximum score is 5. Higher scores are considered to be a better outcome. For each individual, the score prior to treatment was subtracted from the score at 6 months after completion of treatment. Then for each treatment group, these change scores were averaged.
- Change in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Score at 6-Months Post-Treatment [ Time Frame: 2 timepoints: Prior to treatment, and 6 months after completion of treatment. ]
The Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) Assessment is a measure of upper limb motor impairment. Participants are asked to attempt to perform a list of very specific movements of the arm, elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand that take into account synergy patterns, isolated strength, coordination, and hypertonia. Each movement attempt is graded on a 3-point ordinal scale (0, cannot perform; 1, perform partially; and 2, perform fully) and these subscores are summed to provide a maximum score of 66, minimum score of 0.
Higher scores are considered to be a better outcome. For each individual, the score prior to treatment was subtracted from the score at 6 months after completion of treatment. Then for each treatment group, these change scores were averaged.

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-80
- > 6 months of first hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic stroke
- Able to recall 2 of 3 items after 30 minutes
- MRC ≤ 4 for finger extensors on paretic side
- Able to follow 3-stage commands
- Functional movement of shoulder and elbow (e.g., can reach ¾ hand-to- mouth movement) of paretic side
- Caregiver available to assist with device and compliance if needed
- Skin intact on hemiparetic arm
- Medically stable
- Surface NMES trial opens hand without pain
- Full volitional hand opening/closing of contralateral hand
- Upper extremity hand section of FMA < 11/14
- Able to hear and respond to stimulator/cue box auditory cues
- Completed occupational therapy (no concomitant OT)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lack of functional PROM of the wrist or fingers of affected side
- Severe shoulder or hand pain (unable to position hand in the workspace without pain)
- Uncontrolled seizure disorder
- Insensate forearm and/or hand
- Uncompensated hemi-neglect (extinguishing to double simultaneous stimulation)
- Edema of the affected forearm and/or hand
- History of cardiac arrhythmias with hemodynamic instability
- Cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electronic system
- Pregnant
- IM Botox injections in any UE muscle in the last 3 months
- Parkinson's disease, SCI, TBI, or MS
- Ipsilateral motor neuron lesion

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00891319
United States, Ohio | |
MetroHealth Medical Center | |
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44109 |
Principal Investigator: | Jayme S. Knutson, PhD | Case Western Reserve University |
Additional Information:
Publications:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Responsible Party: | Jayme Knutson, Assistant Professor, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, MetroHealth Medical Center |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00891319 History of Changes |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
R01HD059814 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) R01HD059814 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) |
First Posted: | May 1, 2009 Key Record Dates |
Results First Posted: | November 6, 2017 |
Last Update Posted: | November 6, 2017 |
Last Verified: | October 2017 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
hand stroke hemiplegia electrical stimulation recovery |
Stroke Hemiplegia Paresis Cerebrovascular Disorders Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases |
Nervous System Diseases Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Paralysis Neurologic Manifestations Signs and Symptoms |