Exposure With Acceptance-Based Versus Habituation-Based Rationale for Public Speaking Anxiety
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00842946|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : February 12, 2009
Results First Posted : June 2, 2014
Last Update Posted : June 2, 2014
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Public Speaking Social Fear||Behavioral: Exposure w/ Acceptance-Based Rationale Behavioral: Exposure w/ Habituation-Based Rationale||Not Applicable|
Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is a potentially debilitating condition affecting approximately 12% of the population at some point in their life (Ruscio et al., 2008). Nongeneralized SAD refers to individuals whose fears are limited to one or two social situations, most commonly public speaking. Empirically supported treatments for public speaking anxiety generally include an exposure component involving participation in anxiety-provoking public speaking situations (usually simulated situations using an audience of confederates and/or fellow participants, as well as actual public speaking situations in the community). Exposure is often presented within the context of habituation, but cognitively- based therapies utilize a rationale for exposure based on cognitive restructuring and belief modification. Research investigating the incremental benefit of adding other treatment components to exposure has yielded mixed results; however, there is preliminary evidence that the context in which exposure is presented can have an impact on treatment outcome. Recently, acceptance-based therapies have begun to frame exposure as an opportunity to increase one's willingness to experience anxiety while engaging in valued behaviors, rather than as a vehicle for modifying maladaptive cognitions and reducing anxiety. However, little research has been conducted on the efficacy of acceptance-based therapies for public speaking anxiety, and no component control studies have examined the utility of an acceptance/cognitive defusion rationale and context for exposure for public speaking anxiety. The present study will compare two exposure-based treatments for public speaking anxiety in a clinical sample. Specifically, exposure within an acceptance/defusion context will be compared to exposure with a habituation-based rationale.
- Participants receiving exposure within an acceptance/defusion context will experience a greater reduction in anxiety and behavioral avoidance, and greater improvement in measures of quality of life, compared to participants receiving exposure within a habituation rationale, at post-treatment.
- Acceptance, defusion, and mindfulness will mediate treatment outcome. Specifically, greater changes on measures of these three constructs will account for a significant portion of the effect of treatment condition on the dependent variables.
- Lower baseline levels of public speaking anxiety and overall anxiety will be associated with higher baseline quality of life, mindfulness, acceptance, defusion, and social skills.
- Baseline levels of acceptance, defusion, and mindfulness will predict overall treatment response, regardless of intervention condition.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||45 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Single (Outcomes Assessor)|
|Official Title:||Exposure With Acceptance-Based Versus Habituation-Based Rationale for Public Speaking Anxiety|
|Study Start Date :||February 2009|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||November 2009|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||November 2009|
Experimental: Exposure w/ Acceptance-Based Rationale
Behavioral exposure within the context of psychological acceptance.
Behavioral: Exposure w/ Acceptance-Based Rationale
Treatment focuses on the ineffectiveness of participants' past attempts to control or reduce their anxiety in public speaking situations. Acceptance of one's private experiences (thoughts, feelings, sensations) will be introduced. "Willingness" to experience unwanted thoughts and feelings while simultaneously engaging in valued activities, especially those related to public speaking, is stressed. Techniques designed to foster psychological acceptance are practiced prior to and during exposure exercises, as well as assigned for homework between sessions.
Active Comparator: Exposure w/ Habituation-Based Rationale
Behavioral exposure within the context of habituation.
Behavioral: Exposure w/ Habituation-Based Rationale
Exposure to feared public speaking situations are accompanied by explanations of behavioral principles, including classical/operant conditioning and habituation. The process of associating public speaking situations with unwanted feelings of anxiety will be discussed, as well as negative reinforcement of escape and avoidance behaviors. The underlying principle of habituation is reviewed. When engaging in exposure exercises (both in session and assigned homework exercises), participants will be encouraged to remain in the feared speaking situation until their subjective ratings of anxiety decrease.
- Number of Participants in Remission (Per Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID)) [ Time Frame: 6-weeks post-treatment ]
The SCID (First, Spitzer, Gibbon, & Williams, 1996) is an extensively utilized structured diagnostic interview based on DSM-IV criteria. Estimates of interrater reliability range from moderate to high for most Axis I disorders (e.g., Williams et al., 1992; Zanarini
& Frankenburg, 2001).
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00842946
|United States, Pennsylvania|
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19102|
|Study Director:||James D Herbert, Ph.D.||Drexel University|
|Study Director:||Evan M Forman, Ph.D.||Drexel University|