Study on Cemented Versus Non-cemented Hemiarthroplasty in Elderly With Hip Fractures (CNC)
The objective is to study the overall frequency and cumulative rate (during one year) of clinical morbidity (defined as any hospitalization without fatal outcome) and mortality in all consecutive patients undergoing HF surgery (pins and prosthetic implants) and compare this to the group of patients receiving prosthetic implants and further find out if there is a difference between the non-cemented and cemented groups.
Between the same prosthetic groups, the investigators want to study the overall frequency of in-hospital subclinical organ damage and dysfunction of myocardium, liver and lungs, using biochemical plasma markers. Finally, the investigators want to perform perioperative cost benefit calculations and out of hospital quality of life analysis between the surgical groups.
|Hip Fracture||Procedure: cemented Landos prosthesis vs. uncemented Landos prosthesis|
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study on Cemented and Non-cemented Hemiprosthesis in Older Patients With Dislocated Hip Fracture.|
- Mortality [ Time Frame: 1 year after surgery ]
|Study Start Date:||June 2005|
|Study Completion Date:||June 2011|
|Primary Completion Date:||June 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
No Intervention: 1
Active Comparator: 2
Procedure: cemented Landos prosthesis vs. uncemented Landos prosthesis
randomization between the cemented and non-cemented prosthesis.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00800124
|Sykehuset Innlandet, Elverum|
|Elverum, Hedmark, Norway, 2407|
|Principal Investigator:||Ove Talsnes, MD||Sykehsuet Innlandet, Elverum|