Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy (COLD)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00763425|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : October 1, 2008
Last Update Posted : November 18, 2015
The aim of this study is to compare cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for the removal and retrieval of small colorectal polyps.
Cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps up to 8 mm is expected to be more effective than conventional polypectomy.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Colorectal Cancer||Procedure: cold polypectomy Procedure: conventional polypectomy||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||200 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Single (Outcomes Assessor)|
|Study Start Date :||September 2008|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||August 2009|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||September 2009|
Procedure: cold polypectomy
The removal of small colorectal polyps up to 8 mm is performed using cold snare polypectomy.
Other Name: cold snare polypectomy
|Active Comparator: 2||
Procedure: conventional polypectomy
The removal of small colorectal polyps up to 8 mm is performed using conventional polypectomy.
Other Name: polypectomy
- Complete removal rate of colorectal polyps [ Time Frame: two weeks after each polypectomy ]
- Complication rate [ Time Frame: two weeks after each polypectomy ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00763425
|Showa Inan General hospital|
|Komagane, Nagano, Japan, 399-4191|