Brain Activity in Time Discrimination and Sensory Input
This study will use repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, or rTMS (magnetic stimulation to the brain), to examine how the brain distinguishes between two signals that are spaced very closely in time. The ability to tell the difference between sensory signals is important to understanding sensory input. Understanding how this works may help to develop new treatments for sensory deficits.
Healthy volunteers 18 years of age and older may be eligible for this study. Participants undergo the following procedures during three visits to the NIH Clinical Center:
rTMS - all visits (sham rTMS on one visit) :
For TMS, a wire coil is held on the scalp. A brief electrical current passed through the coil creates a magnetic pulse that stimulates the brain. During the stimulation, the subject may be asked to tense certain muscles slightly or perform other simple actions.
Theta burst stimulation (TBS) - all visits (sham TBS on one visit):
Same as TMS, but brief pulses of electrical current are passed through the coil. Subjects undergo intermittent TBS on one visit and continuous TBS on another.
Somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) - all visits:
SEP tests how sensory information travels along the nerves to the spinal cord and brain. A small metal disk electrode placed on an arm delivers a small electrical shock. Electrodes placed on the scalp record how the impulse travels over the nerve pathways to the cerebral cortex of the brain. EEG (see below) records what sensory information the brain is detecting and processing. Paired-pulse SEP is done before and after TBS.
Temporal discrimination threshold - all visits:
This test investigates the brain's ability to discriminate sensory information. Electrodes are placed on the subject's wrist. Two electrical pulses are delivered to the nerve at the wrist at different spaced intervals to determine when the subject feels the two pulses are fused into one. This test is done before and after TBS.
Electroencephalography (EEG) - all visits:
This test records brain waves (electrical activity of the brain). Electrodes are placed on the scalp with an electrode cap. The spaces between the electrodes and the scalp are filled with a gel that conducts electrical activity.
|Study Design:||Time Perspective: Prospective|
|Official Title:||The Relationship Between Temporal Discrimination and Cortical Excitability in Humans|
|Study Start Date:||July 2008|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||April 2010|
The ability to discriminate successive signals separated by time intervals in the millisecond-range is an important element in analyzing the temporal characteristics of sensory input. When two identical stimuli are presented with a sufficient time interval between them, they are readily perceived as being two separate events. As they are presented progressively closer together, there comes a point when the two separate stimuli are perceived as one. However, the neural mechanism of temporal discrimination is unclear. Therefore, our major objective is to analyze, in detail, the effect of cortical excitability and inhibition on temporal sensory discrimination in healthy subjects.
We intend to study 25 adult healthy volunteers.
Assuming the cortical circuit in the somatosensory area plays an important role in temporal discrimination, we plan to investigate the relationship between cortical excitability and the ability of temporal discrimination. We hypothesize that the extent of cortical excitability affects the ability to discriminate. Cortical excitability will be modulated by using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Comparison of cortical excitability changes will be determined before and after rTMS in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI). The change in cortical information processing in SI will be studied using multi-channel electroencephalography (EEG) recording of paired-pulse somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) delivered at rest. Activity assessment in the cortical circuit will be measured by the recovery curve of the amplitude of paired-pulse SEPs.
The primary outcome measure will be the change in amplitude of the paired-pulse SEP component (P27) in 5-ms interstimulus interval condition for three types of rTMS. The secondary outcome will be the amplitude of paired-pulse SEP components during other interstimulus interval conditions (10 to 200 ms).
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00726050
|United States, Maryland|
|National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike|
|Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892|