This site became the new on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu
Give us feedback

Ultrasound Guided Embryo Transfer: Abdominal Versus Transvaginal, a RCT

This study has been completed.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University of Wisconsin, Madison Identifier:
First received: May 16, 2008
Last updated: October 1, 2015
Last verified: May 2008
Ultrasound (US) guided embryo transfer (ET) appears to improve pregnancy outcomes in IVF-ET. Most reports are done using a transabdominal (TAS) approach, in contrast to a transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) which does not require a full bladder. We sought to determine if either approach was better with respect to clinical outcomes.

Infertility in Vitro Fertilization

Study Type: Observational
Study Design: Observational Model: Case Control
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Abdominal Versus Transvaginal Ultrasound Guided Embryo Transfer: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Resource links provided by NLM:

Further study details as provided by University of Wisconsin, Madison:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • pregnancy rates for TAS and TVS ultrasound-guided ET groups [ Time Frame: August 2003 to June 2007 ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Length of time required for embryo transfer [ Time Frame: August 2003 to June 2007 ]
  • differences between transferring physicians [ Time Frame: August 2003 to June 2007 ]
  • multiple pregnancies [ Time Frame: August 2003 to June 2007 ]
  • ectopic pregnancy rates [ Time Frame: August 2003 to June 2007 ]

Enrollment: 224
Study Start Date: August 2003
Study Completion Date: June 2007
Primary Completion Date: June 2007 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
transabdominal ultrasound (TAS) guided embryo transfer
transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) guided embryo transfer


Ages Eligible for Study:   Child, Adult, Senior
Sexes Eligible for Study:   Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Sampling Method:   Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients undergoing assisted reproductive cycles at the University of Wisconsin REI Program

Inclusion Criteria:

- All patients undergoing assisted reproductive cycles including autologous IVF, oocyte donation, and frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles

Exclusion Criteria:

- Cases of severe ovarian hyper-stimulation requiring embryo cryopreservation and gestational surrogate cycles

  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its identifier: NCT00682071

Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Principal Investigator: Steven R Lindheim, MD, MMM Fertility Specialists Medical Group
  More Information

Responsible Party: University of Wisconsin, Madison Identifier: NCT00682071     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 2003-311
IRB# 2003-311 (UW)
HSC# 2003-311 (UW)
Grant: OB/GYN R&D
Funding # 133-FZ71
Study First Received: May 16, 2008
Last Updated: October 1, 2015

Keywords provided by University of Wisconsin, Madison:
embryo transfer
in-vitro fertilization

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Genital Diseases, Male
Genital Diseases, Female processed this record on September 20, 2017