Comparison of Two Methods for Treatment of Colles´s Fracture
The purpose of this study is to compare two different fixationmethods for fractures of the wrist(distal radius fractures). We are comparing an external fixation (Hoffmann-II-non-bridging) vs. an internal fixation(Micronail). Primary endpoint is patient satisfaction as scored by the DASH-questionnaire.Secondary followup is X-rays, strength, PRWE-questionnaire.
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||Comparison of External and Internal Fixationmethods for Distal Radius Fracture - a Randomized Study.|
- DASH-questionnaire [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- PRWE-questionnaire [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|Study Start Date:||January 2008|
|Study Completion Date:||February 2010|
|Primary Completion Date:||February 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Internal fixation with Micronail. 41 patients.
External fixation with Hoffmann-II-non-bridging. 41 patients.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00609479
|Herning, Denmark, 7400|
|Holstebro, Denmark, 7500|
|Viborg, Denmark, 8800|
|Study Chair:||Kjeld Søballe, MD; PhD; Prof.||Department of Orthopedics, University of Aarhus, Denmark|