DaunoXome + Ara-C vs Daunorubicin + Ara-C in Elderly AML
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00589082|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 9, 2008
Last Update Posted : January 9, 2008
Overall results in the treatment of middle aged adults acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) are substantially improved in the last decade, with complete remission (CR) rates established to values of 70 to 80per cent and also encouraging long-term outcome, especially in patients who can tolerate intensified post remissional treatment strategies. On the contrary, there has been little progress in the treatment of older patients. In these patients the response rate generally range between 40 and 60per cent, and overall survival at 2 years is often less than 10 per cent.
Usually, a combination of anthracyclines daunomycin DNR or doxorubicin and cytarabyne Ara-C has been utilized for the remission-induction treatment, with schedules similar to those utilized in younger cases, for patients eligible to intensive treatments. Variation of the dose of DNR has not brought any significant benefit. The EORTC HOVON randomized trial AML9 compared two drugs in induction for previously untreated patients. DNR versus Mithoxantrone (MTZ). MTZ induction therapy produces a slightly better CR rate than DNR-containing regimen (47per cent vs 38per cent, P equals 0.069), without any significant effect on remission duration and survival. The DFS probability between the two treatment arms was not different. The median DFS estimates were 39 weeks in both groups. The DFS rate at 5 years was 8per cent. Also the duration of survival was similar (p equals 0.23) in the two treatment groups. Median survival estimates were 36 weeks (DNR) and 39 weeks (MTZ). The percentage of patients still alive at 5 years were 6per cent and 9per cent respectively.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|AML Elderly||Drug: DaunoXome Drug: Daunorubicine||Phase 3|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||DaunoXome (Liposomal Daunorubicin) Plus Ara-C Versus Daunorubicin Plus Ara-C in Elderly AML Patients.A Randomized Phase III Study.|
|Study Start Date :||October 2001|
|Primary Completion Date :||November 2005|
|Study Completion Date :||November 2005|
Active Comparator: 1
- Efficacy and safety of DaunoXome in association with cytosine arabinoside in terms of reduction of induction deaths respect to standard "3+7" chemotherapy
- Efficacy, in terms of DFS, of maintenance therapy with low-dose of Ara-C plus ATRA versus no maintenance therapy
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00589082
|Principal Investigator:||Franco MANDELLI, Prof||Università di Roma "La Sapienza"|