Transvaginal Diagnostic Study in Women With Pelvic Pain
|Study Design:||Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
|Official Title:||Laparoscopic Assisted Transvaginal Endoscopic Diagnostic Peritoneoscopy in Women With Pelvic Pain|
- To determine the safety and feasibility of the procedure. [ Time Frame: by January 2010 ]
- Measurement of patient's post operative pain [ Time Frame: post-operative day 1 and post-operative day 7 ]
|Study Start Date:||January 2008|
|Study Completion Date:||December 2014|
|Primary Completion Date:||December 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Procedure/Surgery: transvaginal diagnostic peritoneoscopy For patients with pelvic pain, a transvaginal procedure can be done to explore the abdomen. Entering through the vagina, will hopefully decrease the number of ports in the abdomen and decrease pain and healing time.
Procedure: transvaginal diagnostic peritoneoscopy
For patients with pelvic pain, a transvaginal procedure can be done to explore the abdomen. Entering through the vagina, will hopefully decrease the number of ports in the abdomen and decrease pain and healing time.
Approximately 50% of patients with chronic pelvic pain will have a normal laparoscopy. The vast majority of women with endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain and absence of ovarian endometriomata determined by ultrasound will have revised ASRM Stage I or II (peritoneal) disease with preservation of the posterior cul-de-sac. This sparing of the posterior cul-de-sac may offer a preferable route of entry for endoscopic surgery compared to the current standard of care.
Despite all the advantages of laparoscopic surgery, it is not free of risks and pain, and creates scars, which themselves are associated with complications such as abdominal wall hernias and adhesions.
Within this scenario, a new surgical procedure has emerged, called natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). This technique uses existing orifices of the body for introducing optical systems and surgical instruments into the peritoneal cavity by avoiding penetration of the abdominal wall. The expectations are no postoperative pain, optimal cosmesis without any visable scars and shorter recovery similar to therapeutic endoscopy.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00574444
|United States, Missouri|
|University of Missouri Columbia|
|Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65212|
|Principal Investigator:||Klaus Thaler, MD||Dept. of General Surgery at UMHC|