Laparoscopic Simulator Training and Its Impact on Surgical Education
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00555243 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : November 8, 2007
Last Update Posted : January 21, 2013
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Surgical Procedure, Unspecified Surgical Simulation | Procedure: Laparoscopic Simulation training Procedure: Traditional Surgical Education | Not Applicable |
We have designed a randomized control trial to assess the impact of a laparoscopic simulator curriculum on operating room performance amongst gynecology residents. At the beginning of the study, each resident that chooses to participate will take a multiple choice pre-test assessing his or her background knowledge of laparoscopic surgical principles. Everyone will then listen to a series of lectures / video demonstrations teaching the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. The final part of the orientation is to have each resident perform 5 tasks on the laparoscopic simulators (peg transfer, endoloop, pattern cutting, intracorporeal suturing, and extracorporeal suturing) while being proctored by a faculty member who is timing the task and recording any errors made. Each resident will have 2 proctored performances (pre- and post) on the simulator and it will be set up as a typical OSCE-type exam. We chose to have them perform 2 repetitions as opposed to the usual 1 (like on the MCAT, SAT, or other high stake exam) to allow for potential unfamiliarity with the simulator equipment.
The residents will then perform a laparoscopic tubal ligation with a faculty member when they begin their Benign Gynecology rotation. Each resident will subsequently be randomized either traditional teaching (no simulator) or five 30-minute faculty-directed sessions at the Laparoscopic Simulator Lab. Those randomized to simulation training can practice and perform as many repetitions necessary on the simulator to achieve proficiency. Prior to completing the rotation, the residents will perform another laparoscopic tubal ligation with a faculty member blinded to whether they randomized to simulator training to re-assess their technical skills. The resident will have another proctored examination of simulator performance on the five tasks. Finally, a videotape review by independent observers will verify precision of the surgical evaluations at the conclusion of the study.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 108 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Single (Outcomes Assessor) |
Official Title: | An Evaluation of Validated Laparoscopic Skills Simulators and the Impact on Operating Room Performance |
Study Start Date : | August 2005 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | January 2011 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | January 2011 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: 1
Laparoscopic Simulation Education
|
Procedure: Laparoscopic Simulation training
five 30-minute faculty-directed sessions at the Laparoscopic Simulator Lab
Other Name: Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery |
Placebo Comparator: 2 |
Procedure: Traditional Surgical Education
Traditional surgical teaching (no simulator) |
- Whether laparoscopic simulators truly affect real time performance in the operating room among Gynecology residents [ Time Frame: Over the course of one resident rotation (4-6 weeks) ]
- Determine if the level of improvement is inversely related to resident level of training. [ Time Frame: Over the course of one resident rotation (4-6 weeks) ]
- Calculate receiver operator curves to aid in the establishment of a "passing score" threshold on the validated laparoscopic simulators [ Time Frame: Over the course of one resident rotation (4-6 weeks) ]
- Establish whether psychomotor testing predicts surgical proficiency and helps identify those who may need more intensive training over the course of their education. [ Time Frame: Over the course of one resident rotation (4-6 weeks) ]

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | Child, Adult, Older Adult |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- All Ob/Gyn residents in post-graduate years 1-4 from ACGME accredited programs
Exclusion Criteria:
- none

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00555243
United States, Alabama | |
University of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Ob/Gyn | |
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35243 | |
United States, District of Columbia | |
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences | |
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20307 | |
United States, Texas | |
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | |
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390 | |
University of Texas at Houston Department of Ob/Gyn | |
Houston, Texas, United States, 77026 |
Principal Investigator: | Rajiv B Gala, MD | University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center |
Responsible Party: | University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00555243 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
UTSW IRB 042006-034 |
First Posted: | November 8, 2007 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | January 21, 2013 |
Last Verified: | November 2007 |
Laparoscopic Surgical Simulation |