Is Self-Reported Quality Assessment in Surgery Reliable?
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00548535|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified October 2007 by University of Zurich.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : October 24, 2007
Last Update Posted : October 24, 2007
Aim of the study is to evaluate the reliability of self-reported surgical outcome by residents
- prospective assessment of postoperative complications done by residents using a validated five-scale complication classification
- simultanously, complications will be prospectively assessed in the same manner by an external clinical nurse
- Trial with surgical intervention
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment|
|Patients of Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery||Procedure: Reliability of complication assessment|
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Study Start Date :||January 2007|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||January 2008|
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00548535
|Contact: Daniel Dindo, MD||+41 (0)44 255 11 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|University Hospital of Zurich||Recruiting|
|Contact: Daniel Dindo, MD email@example.com|
|Principal Investigator:||Daniel Dindo||UniversitaetsSpital Zuerich|