Subretinal Lucentis for Hemorrhagic Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Visual outcomes of the eye with large subretinal hemorrhages (bleeding under the retina) due to Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) are poor. The Submacular Surgery Trial (SST) showed that no statistically significant improvement in vision resulted from surgical removal of the layer of abnormal blood vessels causing the bleeding. However, placement of a gas bubble into the gel of the eye along with removal of the blood has shown some success. However, this does not treat the underlying condition of the AMD.
Intravitreal injections (into the gel of the eye) of a drug called Lucentis has been shown to be highly effective in the treatment of AMD, yet its penetration through areas of thick blood caused by subretinal hemorrhage is not known.
This study is proposing to treat the AMD causing the subretinal hemorrhage with a vitrectomy (surgery involving removing the gel inside the eye, and membrane layers of the eye) followed by Lucentis placed between the layers of the retina and then with or without a gas bubble.
In order to determine if the the subretinal Lucentis alone is beneficial, 5 of the 10 patients enrolled will get a gas bubble and the other 5 will not.
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||Use of Subretinal Ranibizumab (Lucentis) in the Management of Submacular Hemorrhage in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)|
- To investigate the safety and tolerability of vitrectomy combined with a single dose of subretinal Ranibizumab (Lucentis - 0.5 mg) in patients with submacular hemorrhage and choroidal neovascular membranes secondary to AMD. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean change in visual acuity, angiographic area, retinal thickness by optical coherence tomography, mean number of retreatments required by 12 months. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|Study Start Date:||September 2007|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||October 2008|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||October 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Active Comparator: A
Does not receive Gas bubble
These patients will have a vitrectomy where the gel is removed but will not receive the gas bubble.
Active Comparator: B
Does receive gas bubble
A gas bubble will be placed in the eye after the gel has been removed.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00538538
|United States, Michigan|
|William Beaumont Hospital|
|Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073|
|Principal Investigator:||Tarek Hassan, MD||Associated Retinal Consultants/William Beaumont Hosp.|