This site became the new on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu
Give us feedback

A Systematic Review on the Accuracy and Reliability the BodyGem/MedGem Metabolic Devices

This study has been completed.
Information provided by:
Microlife Identifier:
First received: July 16, 2007
Last updated: NA
Last verified: July 2007
History: No changes posted
With the number of individuals becoming overweight or obese, healthcare professionals are in need of accurate, reliable, and convenient tools to help personalize weight loss programs. Recently, a new indirect calorimeter (i.e. MedGem / BodyGem; aka “Gem”) was introduced as a convenient solution to determine resting metabolic rate (RMR) for assessment of daily energy needs. Several validation and comparison studies were conducted to determine if the Gem device is accurate and reliable. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of previous studies that evaluated the accuracy and reliability of the Gem devices.

Resting Metabolic Rate

Study Type: Observational
Study Design: Observational Model: Case Control
Primary Purpose: Screening
Time Perspective: Longitudinal
Time Perspective: Retrospective
Official Title: A Systematic Review on the Accuracy and Reliability of a Hand-Held Indirect Calorimeter for Assessing Energy Needs in Adults & Children

Further study details as provided by Microlife:

Study Start Date: November 2006

Ages Eligible for Study:   Child, Adult, Senior
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Random or counterbalanced assignment of participants to eliminate measurement bias; similar subject positioning for both Gem and reference system measurement or adjustment to a measurement for positioning differences; and use of a measurement protocol that is similar to the established “best practice” guidelines for employing indirect calorimetry
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its identifier: NCT00502931

United States, Colorado
Microlife Health Solutions
Golden, Colorado, United States, 80401
Sponsors and Collaborators
Principal Investigator: Scott O McDoniel, M.Ed. Microlife USA, Inc.
  More Information Identifier: NCT00502931     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: ML003
Study First Received: July 16, 2007
Last Updated: July 16, 2007 processed this record on August 16, 2017