Cognitive Therapy to Improve Word Finding
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00494520|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 29, 2007
Last Update Posted : September 19, 2017
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment|
|Anomia Aphasia Traumatic Brain Injury Cerebrovascular Accident||Procedure: Errorful training condition Procedure: Errorless training condition|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||78 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Learning Paradigms in Aphasia Rehabilitation|
|Study Start Date :||July 2004|
|Primary Completion Date :||June 2009|
|Study Completion Date :||June 2009|
Experimental: Errorful training condition
A type of anomia rehabilitation paradigm which allows for errors. The intervention involves providing minimal auditory cues to allow for errors in picture naming.
Procedure: Errorful training condition
Errorful training condition: Participant saw a picture and named it without any cues. If an error was produced, the cue with the least amount of information was provided (e.g. for "pumpkin", "pu"). Cues with increasing information were provided until the picture was correctly named (e.g. for "pumpkin": "pump", "pumpki", then "pumpkin"). Once the correct name was provided, the trial ended.
Experimental: Errorless training condition
A type of anomia rehabilitation paradigm in which the situation surrounding the performance of the desired task (i.e., picture naming) is controlled to prevent errors. The intervention involves providing maximal auditory cues to prevent errors in picture naming.
Procedure: Errorless training condition
Errorless learning (EL) condition: Participant saw a picture with its name, and repeated the word. The participant continued to name the picture as the auditory cues provided less and less of the word (e.g. for "banana" she would hear "banan", "bana" then "ba" and finally no cue). If an error was produced at any stage, the whole word was presented, the participant repeated it, and the trial ended.
- Improved picture naming of trained words. [ Time Frame: Following conclusion of word treatment. ]Overall accuracy of named trained items
- Improved picture naming of trained words. [ Time Frame: At 6 months after conclusion of word treatment ]Overall accuracy of named trained items
- Improved picture naming of untrained words. [ Time Frame: Following conclusion of word treatment. ]Overall accuracy of named untrained items
- Improved picture naming of untrained words. [ Time Frame: At 6 months after conclusion of word treatment ]Overall accuracy of named untrained items
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00494520
|United States, District of Columbia|
|Georgetown University Medical Center|
|Washington, D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20057|
|Principal Investigator:||Rhonda B. Friedman, Ph.D.||Georgetown University|