Erlotinib in Women With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulvar
|Study Design:||Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||A Phase II Trial of Tarceva (Erlotinib) in Women With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulvar|
- Response Rate [ Time Frame: Assessed prior to definitive surgery or chemoradiation therapy (cohort 1 pts) or after 2 cycles of therapy (cohort 2 pts). ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Response is defined as achieving complete or partial response.Complete response (CR) for both cohorts was defined as resolution of all identified tumor masses on the vulva or disappearance of all target and non-target lesions with no evidence of new lesions documented by two disease assessments at least 4 weeks apart. For cohort 1 pts, a partial response (PR) was defined as a 30% reduction in the product of all diameters of the vulva tumor/tumors compared to baseline measurements. For cohort 2 pts, PR defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) was at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target measurable lesions (baseline sum LD reference).
|Study Start Date:||December 2006|
|Study Completion Date:||October 2012|
|Primary Completion Date:||October 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Patients rcvd oral erlotinib 150 mg/day. Cohort 1 pts would have at least 28 days and no more than 42 days of therapy in advance of definitive therapy (surgery or chemoradiation). Cohort 2 pts continued on therapy (28 days per cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Two potential dose reductions were prescribed to 100 and 50 mg/day.
Orally every day for about 4-6 weeks
Other Name: Tarceva
• To determine the clinical efficacy of erlotinib in reducing the size of vulvar squamous cell cancer and /or metastatic lesions.
- To determine the safety and tolerability of oral erlotinib.
- To evaluate apoptosis and assess the Ki67, phospho-EGFR, EGFR mutation and EGFR amplification status of the vulvar cancer prior to and after therapy and correlate observed changes with response to therapy.
- To evaluate the impact of medical treatment on the subsequent surgery for vulvar cancer when surgery is chosen as the definitive therapy.
This study used a two-stage design to evaluate efficacy of erlotinib based on response determined prior to definitive surgery or chemoradiation (cohort 1) or after every 2 cycles of erlotinib (cohort 2). The null and alternative response rates defined as achieving partial response (PR) or better were 3.5% and 15%. If 1 or more patients enrolled in stage one (n=17 patients) achieved PR or better than accrual would proceed to stage two (n=24 patients). There was 0.55 probability of stopping the trial at stage one if the true OR rate was 3.5%. If 3 or fewer responses were observed by the end of stage two, erlotinib would be deemed ineffective. The significance level of the study design was 0.0495 with a power of 85% to rule out a poor response rate of less than 3.5%.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00476476
|United States, Massachusetts|
|Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center|
|Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115|
|Massachusetts General Hospital|
|Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02214|
|Dana-Farber Cancer Institute|
|Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215|
|United States, Rhode Island|
|Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island|
|Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02905|
|Principal Investigator:||Neil S. Horowitz, MD||Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital|