Validation of Esophageal Variceal Grading: A Comparative Study of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) Endoscopy and Capsule Endoscopy
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
|Study Design:||Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Single Blind
Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
|Official Title:||Validation of Esophageal Variceal Grading: A Comparative Study of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) Endoscopy and Capsule Endoscopy|
- The primary endpoint of the study will be to develop a grading system for esophageal varices using capsule endoscopy. [ Time Frame: Two years ]
- Secondary endpoints include sensitivity, specificity, inter- and intraobserver variation of variceal grading using capsule endoscopy; patient acceptance; and a cost comparison (facility + professional fees) of the two screening methods. [ Time Frame: Two years ]
|Study Start Date:||January 2007|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||May 2008|
Up to 35% of patients with cirrhosis will develop esophageal varices, which carry with them a 1-year and 3-year bleeding rate of 33% and 41%, respectively. Screening for varices with a video endoscopy is limited by its cost, patient compliance, and the risks of sedating a patient with portal hypertension. Capsule endoscopy is a novel method that may reduce the costs and increase compliance for screening.
The investigators propose to screen 100 consecutive patients with advanced cirrhosis for esophageal varices. A capsule endoscopy and video endoscopy will be done on the same day. The varices seen on video endoscopy will be graded using a standard grading scale. Both capsule and video endoscopy images will be assessed in a blinded fashion by 4 independent investigators. Finally, the video endoscopic images will be compared to capsule endoscopy to develop a capsule endoscopy grading system that corresponds to video endoscopy.
The primary endpoint of the study will be to develop a grading system for esophageal varices using capsule endoscopy. Secondary endpoints of the study include sensitivity, specificity, inter- and intraobserver variation of variceal grading using capsule endoscopy; patient acceptance as assessed on a visual analogue scale; and a cost comparison (facility fees + professional fees) of the two screening methods.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00475592
|Contact: Paul J Thuluvath, MDemail@example.com|
|Contact: Karen L Krok, MDfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|United States, Maryland|
|Johns Hopkins Hospital||Recruiting|
|Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205|
|Principal Investigator: Paul J Thuluvath, MD|
|Sub-Investigator: Karen L Krok, MD|
|Principal Investigator:||Paul J Thuluvath, MD||Johns Hopkins University|