A Study Of Sunitinib Compared To Placebo For Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Islet Cell Tumors
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00428597 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Terminated
(Refer to Detailed Description.)
First Posted : January 30, 2007
Results First Posted : October 11, 2010
Last Update Posted : October 11, 2010
|
Sponsor:
Pfizer
Information provided by:
Pfizer
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Brief Summary:
This study randomized patients with advanced pancreatic islet cell tumors to receive either sunitinib or placebo. Patients who were randomized to sunitinib received 37.5 mg of sunitinib daily, those randomized to placebo received a tablet that looked similar but had no active drug. Neither the patient or the doctor knew whether the patient was receiving sunitinib or placebo. Patients were followed to determine the status and size of their tumors, survival, quality of life and safety of the drug.
The study was designed to detect a 50% improvement in median PFS[Progression Free Survival] with 90% power and was to enroll 340 subjects. An interim analysis was planned when 130 events had occurred, and the final analysis was to be conducted when 260 events had occurred.
Study A6181111 was stopped early during the enrollment period because of a clear and clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy for the sunitinib treatment arm as recommended by the DMC [Data Monitoring Committee]. The actual number of subjects enrolled was 171 and the actual number of PFS events recorded was 81 PFS events. The decision to terminate the study was not based on safety concerns related to sunitinib administration.
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Carcinoma, Islet Cell Carcinoma, Pancreas | Drug: sunitinib malate Drug: Placebo | Phase 3 |
The study was terminated on 11 March 2009 because the independent Data Monitoring Committee determined that the study had met its primary endpoint in demonstrating improvement in progression-free survival. The decision to terminate the trial was not based on safety concerns related to sunitinib administration.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 171 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | Double (Participant, Investigator) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind Study Of Sunitinib (SU011248, SUTENT) Versus Placebo In Patients With Progressive Advanced/Metastatic Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Islet Cell Tumors |
| Study Start Date : | June 2007 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | April 2009 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | April 2009 |
Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: A |
Drug: sunitinib malate
|
| Placebo Comparator: B |
Drug: Placebo
Placebo to match sunitinib taken daily (oral) on the same schedule as active agent below. |
Primary Outcome Measures :
- Progression Free Survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: From time of randomization through Day 1 of Week 5, Week 9, and then every 8 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death ]Time from randomization to first progression of disease (PD) or death for any reason in the absence of documented PD. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus first randomization date +1) divided by 30.4.
Secondary Outcome Measures :
- Number of Subjects With Objective Response [ Time Frame: From time of randomization through Day 1 of Week 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter ]Objective response = subjects with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) for at least 4 weeks, confirmed by repeat tumor assessments. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A PR was defined as a > = 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.
- Duration of Response (DR) [ Time Frame: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Week 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death due to any cause ]Time in months from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. DR was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.4.
- Time-to-Tumor Response (TTR) [ Time Frame: From time of randomization through Day 1 of Week 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter ]Time from randomization to the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed.
- Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: From start of study treatment up to 22 months ]Time in months from time of randomization to date of death due to any cause. The median number of months is provided; however, the study was terminated early. OS data was not mature by the time of analysis. Median OS time cannot be accurately estimated by Kaplan-Meier method for either treatment arm.
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of LifeQuestionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) - Global Quality of Life (QoL) Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
- EORTC QLQ-C30 - Cognitive Functioning Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
- EORTC QLQ-C30 - Emotional Functioning Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
- EORTC QLQ-C30 - Physical Functioning Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
- EORTC QLQ-C30 - Role Functioning Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
- EORTC QLQ-C30 - Social Functioning Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
- EORTC QLQ-C30 - Appetite Loss Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
- EORTC QLQ-C30 - Constipation Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
- EORTC QLQ-C30 - Diarrhea Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
- EORTC QLQ-C30 - Dyspnea Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
- EORTC QLQ-C30 - Fatigue Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
- EORTC QLQ-C30 - Financial Difficulties Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
- EORTC QLQ-C30 - Insomnia Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
- EORTC QLQ-C30 - Nausea and Vomiting Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
- EORTC QLQ-C30 - Pain Subscale [ Time Frame: Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter (Day 1 of each 4-week cycle) and at end of treatment/withdrawal ]EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
Information from the National Library of Medicine
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Well-differentiated advanced/metastatic pancreatic islet cell tumor
- Tumor has shown progression within the past year.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current treatment with any chemotherapy, chemoembolization therapy, immunotherapy, or investigational anticancer agent other than somatostatin analogues
- Prior treatment with any tyrosine kinase inhibitors or anti-VEGF[Vascular endothelial growth factor] angiogenic inhibitors.
- Prior treatment with non-VEGF-targeted angiogenic inhibitors is permitted
Information from the National Library of Medicine
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00428597
Locations
Show 54 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Pfizer
Investigators
| Study Director: | Pfizer CT.gov Call Center | Pfizer |
Additional Information:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Director, Clinical Trial Disclosure Group, Pfizer Inc |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00428597 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
A6181111 |
| First Posted: | January 30, 2007 Key Record Dates |
| Results First Posted: | October 11, 2010 |
| Last Update Posted: | October 11, 2010 |
| Last Verified: | September 2010 |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Carcinoma Adenoma, Islet Cell Carcinoma, Islet Cell Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms Adenoma Pancreatic Neoplasms Digestive System Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Endocrine Gland Neoplasms Digestive System Diseases Pancreatic Diseases |
Endocrine System Diseases Adenocarcinoma Sunitinib Antineoplastic Agents Angiogenesis Inhibitors Angiogenesis Modulating Agents Growth Substances Physiological Effects of Drugs Growth Inhibitors Protein Kinase Inhibitors Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action |