A Trial of Romidepsin for Progressive or Relapsed Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Celgene ( Celgene Corporation )
First received: January 23, 2007
Last updated: December 11, 2015
Last verified: December 2015
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the activity of romidepsin in patients with progressive or relapsed peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) who have already been treated with systemic therapy.
Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
||Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
||A Phase II, Multicenter, Open-Label Trial Evaluating The Activity And Tolerability Of Romidepsin (Depsipeptide, FK228) In Progressive Or Relapsed Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Following Prior Systemic Therapy (GPI-06-0002)
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response According to the International Workshop Response Criteria (IWC) for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas (NHL) Assessed by an Independent Review Committee [ Time Frame: Response was assessed after every 2 cycles of treatment and at completion of therapy, up until 31 October 2010 (maximum duration on study was 1086 days). ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Complete Response (CR): >75% decrease in size aggregate of nodal index lesions (large and small), complete disappearance of extranodal and non-index lesions; total disappearance of clinical disease including skin involvement; disease-related signs and symptoms, normalization of biochemical abnormalities and reduction in size of spleen or liver so no longer palpable. Unconfirmed CR: all above criteria except all nodal index lesions must have regressed >75% in the sum of the product diameters (SPD) from baseline. Individual nodes previously confluent must have regressed by >75% in their SPD.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Percentage of Participants With Objective Disease Response [ Time Frame: Response was assessed after every 2 cycles of treatment and at completion of therapy, up until 31 October 2010 (maximum duration on study was 1086 days). ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Objective disease response was defined as patients with a Complete Response, Unconfirmed Complete Response or a Partial Response according to the IWC 1999 assessed by an independent review committee: CR, Cru defined above, PR defined as ≥50% decrease in size of 6 largest dominant nodes and/or nodal masses & extranodal index lesions and no increase of non-index lesions, liver, or spleen; no new sites of disease evident; skin lesions decreased by ≥50%.
- Duration of Objective Disease Response [ Time Frame: Response was assessed after every 2 cycles of treatment and at completion of therapy, up until 31 October 2010 (maximum duration on study was 1086 days). ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Duration of response was defined as the number of days from the date of the first disease response (Complete, Unconfirmed Complete or Partial Response) until the date of progression and was determined using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates. Progression was defined as: a ≥50% increase from the nadir in the individual sum of the products of the diameters of any index lesion; the reappearance of pathology, enlargement of liver/spleen, or unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease or appearance of any new lesions.
- Duration of Complete Disease Response [ Time Frame: Response was assessed after every 2 cycles of treatment and at completion of therapy, up until 31 October 2010 (maximum duration on study was 1086 days). ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Duration of response was defined as the number of days from the date of the first disease response (Complete or Unconfirmed Complete) until the date of progression and was determined using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates. Progression was defined as: a ≥50% increase from the nadir in the individual sum of the products of the diameters of any index lesion; the reappearance of pathology, enlargement of liver/spleen, or unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease or appearance of any new lesions.
- Time to Disease Progression [ Time Frame: Response was assessed after every 2 cycles of treatment and at completion of therapy, up until 31 October 2010 (maximum duration on study was 1086 days). ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Time to progression (≥50% increase from the nadir in the individual sum of the products of the diameters of any index lesion; the reappearance of pathology, enlargement of liver/spleen, or unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease or appearance of any new lesions) was defined as the duration from the date of the first study drug dose to the date of relapse or progression as reported by the independent review committee and was determined using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates.
- Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status [ Time Frame: From Baseline to 31 March 2010 (up to 33.4 months). ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The ECOG scale is as follows:
Grade 0: Fully active, able to perform all pre-disease activities without restriction; Grade 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory, able to carry out light work; Grade 2: Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to work. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; Grade 3: Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair > 50% of waking hours; Grade 4: Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Confined to bed or chair.
Data reported is the shift from Baseline ECOG score to best on-study assessment score.
| Study Start Date:
| Estimated Study Completion Date:
| Primary Completion Date:
||October 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Participants received romidepsin 14 mg/m^2 administered intravenously over 4 hours on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Participants continued on monthly cycles of romidepsin. The planned duration of study therapy was 6 cycles. Patients who responded could continue beyond 6 cycles until disease progression or other withdrawal criteria were met. For participants treated for 12 or more cycles, maintenance dosing (2 doses per cycle) was permitted.
Romidepsin intravenously (through a vein) over 4 hours on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle.
This is a Phase II, non-randomized, open-label, single-arm trial. This study is designed on the basis of complete response [CR or CR(u)] as the measure of efficacy, based on the best overall response of each patient. The sample size of 65 patients evaluable for efficacy would yield lower 95% confidence limits on the rate of CR + CR(u) that would range from 2.2% to 7.7%, if the observed rate of CR + CR(u) ranges from 8% to 15%. The study was amended to include an Extension Phase, during which patients at non-US sites who are benefitting from treatment can continue to receive romidepsin. The Extension Study Phase is active in EU countries where currently no Marketing Authorisation exists for romidepsin. Patients may remain on study until progressive disease occurs or they withdraw their consent and only serious adverse events and study drug administration data will continue to be collected and reported for these patients.
|Ages Eligible for Study:
||18 Years and older
|Genders Eligible for Study:
|Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Patients must fulfill all of the following criteria to be eligible for study participation and have:
- Histologically confirmed PTCL not otherwise specified, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma nasal type, enteropathy- type T-cell lymphoma, subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma, cutaneous γδ T-cell lymphoma (excludes mycosis fungoides or Sezary syndrome), transformed mycosis fungoides, hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL; anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK]-1 negative), or patients with ALK 1 expressing ALCL (ALK-1 positive) who have relapsed disease after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT);
- Age ≥18 years;
- Written informed consent;
- Progressive disease following at least one systemic therapy or refractory to at least one prior systemic therapy;
- Measurable disease according to the International Workshop Response (IWC) criteria and/or measurable cutaneous disease;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2;
- Serum potassium ≥3.8 mmol/L and magnesium ≥0.85 mmol/L (electrolyte abnormalities can be corrected with supplementation to meet inclusion criteria);
- Negative urine or serum pregnancy test on females of childbearing potential; and
- All women of childbearing potential must use an effective barrier method of contraception (either an intrauterine contraceptive device [IUCD] or double barrier method using condoms or a diaphragm plus spermicide) during the treatment period and for at least 1 month thereafter. Male patients should use a barrier method of contraception during the treatment period and for at least 1 month thereafter. Hormonal methods of contraception such as the contraceptive pill or patch (particularly those containing ethinyl-estradiol) should be avoided due to a potential drug interaction.
Patients are ineligible for entry if any of the following criteria are met:
- Known central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma [computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are required only if brain metastasis is suspected clinically];
- Chemotherapy or immunotherapy within 4 weeks of study entry (6 weeks if nitrosoureas given);
Initiation of corticosteroids during study (defined as 7 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1[C1D1] until study drug discontinuation)
- Patients treated with a pulse of steroids were to discontinue steroid use 7 days prior to C1D1 and have a repeat CT scan and disease assessment after discontinuation of corticosteroids and before starting romidepsin;
- Concomitant use of any other anti-cancer therapy;
- Concomitant use of any investigational agent;
- Use of any investigational agent within 4 weeks of study entry;
Any known cardiac abnormalities such as:
- Congenital long QT syndrome;
- QTc interval >480 milliseconds (msec);
- A myocardial infarction within 6 months of C1D1. Patients with a history of myocardial infraction between 6 and 12 months prior to C1D1 who are asymptomatic and have had a negative cardiac risk assessment (treadmill stress test, nuclear medicine stress test, or stress echocardiogram) since the event may participate;
- Other significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities including 2nd degree atrio-ventricular (AV) block type II, 3rd degree AV block, or bradycardia (ventricular rate less than 50 beats/min).
- Symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD), e.g., angina Canadian Class II-IV. In any patient in whom there is doubt, the patient should be referred to a cardiologist for evaluation;
- An ECG recorded at screening showing significant ST depression (ST depression of ≥2 mm, measured from isoelectric line to the ST segment at a point 60 msec at the end of the QRS complex). If in any doubt, the patient should have a stress imaging study and, if abnormal, angiography to define whether or not CAD is present;
- Congestive heart failure (CHF) that meets New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II to IV definitions and/or ejection fraction <40% by MUGA scan or <50% by echocardiogram and/or MRI;
- A known history of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), Torsade de Pointes, or cardiac arrest unless currently addressed with an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD);
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or restrictive cardiomyopathy from prior treatment or other causes (if in doubt, see ejection fraction criteria above);
- Uncontrolled hypertension, i.e., blood pressure (BP) of ≥160/95; patients who have a history of hypertension controlled by medication must be on a stable dose (for at least one month) and meet all other inclusion criteria;
- Any cardiac arrhythmia requiring anti-arrhythmic medication;
- Serum potassium <3.8 mmol/L or serum magnesium <0.85 mmol/L (electrolyte abnormalities can be corrected with supplementation to meet inclusion criteria);
- Concomitant use of drugs that may cause a significant prolongation of the QTc;
- Concomitant use of CYP3A4 significant or moderate inhibitors;
- Concomitant use of therapeutic warfarin or another anticoagulant due to a potential drug interaction. Use of a small dose of a anticoagulant to maintain patency of venous access port and cannulas is permitted;
- Clinically significant active infection;
- Known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, or hepatitis C;
- Previous extensive radiotherapy involving ≥30% of bone marrow (e.g., whole pelvis, half spine), excluding patients who have had total body irradiation as part of a conditioning regimen for ASCT;
- Major surgery within 2 weeks of study entry;
- Previous allogeneic stem cell transplant;
Inadequate bone marrow or other organ function as evidenced by:
- Hemoglobin <9 g/dL (transfusions and/or erythropoietin are permitted);
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤1.0 × 10^9 cells/L [patients with neutropenia (ANC 1-1.5 10^9 cells/L) as a function of their disease may be supported with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)];
- Platelet count <100 × 10^9 cells/L or platelet count <75 × 10^9 cells/L if bone marrow disease involvement is documented;
- Total bilirubin >2.0 × upper limit of normal (ULN) or >3.0 × ULN in the presence of demonstrable liver metastases;
- Aspartate transaminase/serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (AST/SGOT) and alanine transaminase/serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (ALT/SGPT) >2.0 × ULN or >3.0 × ULN in the presence of demonstrable liver metastases; or
- Serum creatinine >2.0 × ULN;
- Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding;
- Coexistent second malignancy or history of prior solid organ malignancy within previous 3 years (excluding basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, and in situ carcinoma of the cervix (CIN 1) that has been treated curatively);
- Any prior history of a hematologic malignancy (other than T-cell lymphoma);
- Any significant medical or psychiatric condition that might prevent the patient from complying with all study procedures; or
- Prior exposure to romidepsin (other histone deacetylase inhibitors are allowed).
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below.
For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00426764
||Kenichi Takeshita, MD
Coiffier B, Pro B, Prince HM, Foss F, Sokol L, Greenwood M, Caballero D, Borchmann P, Morschhauser F, Wilhelm M, Pinter-Brown L, Padmanabhan S, Shustov A, Nichols J, Carroll S, Balser J, Balser B, Horwitz S. Results from a pivotal, open-label, phase II study of romidepsin in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma after prior systemic therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 20;30(6):631-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.4223. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Horwitz S, Coiffier B, Foss F, Prince HM, Sokol L, Greenwood M, Caballero D, Morschhauser F, Pinter-Brown L, Iyer SP, Shustov A, Nichols J, Balser J, Balser B, Pro B. Utility of ¹⁸fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for prognosis and response assessments in a phase 2 study of romidepsin in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(4):774-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv010. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
Coiffier B, Pro B, Prince HM, Foss F, Sokol L, Greenwood M, Caballero D, Morschhauser F, Wilhelm M, Pinter-Brown L, Padmanabhan Iyer S, Shustov A, Nielsen T, Nichols J, Wolfson J, Balser B, Horwitz S. Romidepsin for the treatment of relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: pivotal study update demonstrates durable responses. J Hematol Oncol. 2014 Jan 23;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-7-11.
||Celgene ( Celgene Corporation )
History of Changes
|Other Study ID Numbers:
|Study First Received:
||January 23, 2007
|Results First Received:
||July 5, 2012
||December 11, 2015
||United States: Food and Drug Administration
Keywords provided by Celgene:
peripheral T-cell lymphoma
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on April 27, 2016
Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral
Immune System Diseases
Neoplasms by Histologic Type