Epoetin Dosing Regimens in Haemodialysis
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00349960|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 10, 2006
Last Update Posted : July 10, 2006
Currently, less frequent than once weekly subcutaneous epoetin administration regimens were shown to be equally effective and safe as the once-weekly schedules in stable pre-dialyzed and peritoneal dialyzed patients Bioequivalence of once-every-two-weeks and once-weekly subcutaneous administration of the same total dose of epoetin beta for the maintenance phase of anemia treatment in stable, iron-replete, chronic hemodialyzed patients was therefore prospectively investigated.
two treatment schedules will be considered equivalent if the primary efficacy parameters will be simultaneously similar for both groups and in the predefined range of variation. Confidence intervals (CIs) will be used to compare groups. Since the target Hb in dialyzed patients is defined as 11g/dL (110 g/L) by the European Guidelines and as >10 g/dL (100 g/L) by the National Guidelines, with a recommended upper limit of 13 g/dL (130 g/L), the efficacy range for Hb in this study was predefined as 10-12 g/dL (100-120 g/L). The two treatment schedules will be considered to have similar efficacy if the mean Hb in Group 2w will not differ by more than ±0.5 g/dL (±5 g/L) compared to Group 1w during the assessment period. Once similar efficacy established, drug requirements will be compared calculating the ratio of the mean weekly epoetin doses in Group 2w/Group 1w. A range of 0.8 to 1.25 for the ratio is considered sufficient to define bioequivalence. Equivalence of drug usage in the two arms will be accepted if the whole 95% CI for this ratio will be within the above limits.
Lack of difference between group means does not imply similar distribution of treatment effects within each group. The individual hemoglobin change will be used to assess if response to treatment was similarly variable in the two arms. The change in Hb will be calculated for each patient as the difference between the mean Hb during the assessment period and the mean Hb during the baseline phase.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Hemodialyzed Patients Epoetin Treatment||Drug: NeoRecormon SC once-weekly versus once-every-other-week||Not Applicable|
Show Detailed Description
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Enrollment :||200 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Once-Weekly Versus Once-Fortnightly Subcutaneous Epoetin Beta Administration in the Maintenance Phase of Anaemia Treatment in Haemodialyzed Patients|
|Study Start Date :||March 2004|
|Study Completion Date :||December 2005|
- hemoglobin level in the assessment period (average of all values from weeks 13-24)
- weekly epoetin beta dose per dry body weight in the assessment period (average of all values from weeks 13-24)
- the percentage of patients maintaining target Hb without any increase in epoetin dose during the assessment period;
- the difference between the average Hb levels during the assessment period versus the baseline phase;
- the difference between the average weekly epoetin beta dose during the assessment period versus the baseline phase.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00349960
|"Dr Carol Davila" Teaching Hospital of Nephrology|
|Bucharest, Romania, 010731|
|Dialysis Centre, Army Medical Diagnosis and Treatment Centre|
|Dialysis Centre, “Fundeni” Clinical Institute, Bucharest|
|“Sf. Ioan Nou” Clinical Hospital, Nephrology and Dialysis Department|
|Nephrology and Dialysis Clinic, Cluj Clinical County Hospital|
|Cluj Napoca, Romania|
|Nephrology and Dialysis Clinic, Craiova Clinical County Hospital|
|Dialysis and Transplantation Center, “CI Parhon” University Hospital|
|Nephrology and Dialysis Department, Dâmboviţa County Hospital|
|Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Centre, Timisoara County Hospital|
|Study Director:||Gabriel Mircescu Mircescu, Professor||Romanian Society of Nephrology|